Discussion
Vinh1's query about trading a Patek Philippe Ref. 3940 for a Ref. 5140, plus cash, sparked a lively debate among collectors. This discussion highlights the nuanced considerations beyond mere monetary value, delving into aesthetics, wearability, and the subtle design differences that define these iconic perpetual calendars. Vinh1's post serves as a valuable prompt for understanding collector preferences within Patek Philippe's esteemed perpetual calendar lineage.
Both are in yellow gold
The Patek Philippe Reference 3940 is a perpetual calendar wristwatch that was introduced in 1985, succeeding the Reference 3450. It is notable for its relatively slim profile and the integration of a perpetual calendar complication in a refined case. This reference became a cornerstone of Patek Philippe's complicated watch offerings for nearly two decades, establishing a design language for subsequent perpetual calendar models. It represents a significant period in the brand's modern history of complicated timepieces.
The watch features a 36mm case, typically crafted from yellow gold, rose gold, white gold, or platinum. It houses the self-winding Caliber 240 Q movement, which is known for its micro-rotor construction, contributing to the movement's thinness and allowing for a slimmer case profile. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The dial is protected by a sapphire crystal, often accompanied by an interchangeable solid case back and a sapphire display back.
Reference 3940 is highly regarded by collectors for its classic proportions and the enduring appeal of its perpetual calendar display, which includes day, date, month, leap year cycle, and moon phases. It was produced in several series, with subtle variations in dial layout and typography, making early series examples particularly sought after. The reference is considered a benchmark for perpetual calendar watches and remains a significant piece for those appreciating traditional horological complications.
I prefer the 3940. It has better dial symmetry. I also cannot get pass the smaller “5” and “27” numerals on the subdial at 6. Best Gatsby
I would trade the J for a R iteration which I find the most beautiful of the four metals, but in any case I would stick to 3940 the absolutely perfect daily wearer pc
3940 is a good watch. But 5140 has another modern charm point
It's your watch, and your money so whatever makes you smile is the right thing for you to do
but the 5140 is more legible. I sold my 5940 because it was not legible. I find perpetual calendars like the 5320 and 5159 more legible as one can see all the information at a glance.
THE perpetual calendar , the 5140 is a gorgeous piece but just the one after it...
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 36 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
