Vintage
Nicolas (amanico) sparks a compelling discussion by presenting a pristine 1963 Omega Speedmaster ST 105.003, often referred to as the 'Ed White,' and contrasting it with its recently announced re-edition. His post encourages collectors to weigh the 'soul' and authenticity of a vintage icon against the practicalities and modern appeal of a contemporary homage. This exploration delves into the enduring allure of original references and the nuanced considerations collectors face when a beloved historical piece is reissued.
The Omega reference ST105.003 is a significant early iteration of the chronograph series, recognized for its specific design elements that differentiate it from later versions. This reference is part of the foundational period for the model line, preceding many of the more widely known configurations. It represents a key stage in the evolution of the series, showcasing design characteristics that were subsequently refined or altered in successor references. Its distinct features are often a point of interest for collectors focusing on the early development of the model.
This reference typically features a stainless steel case, housing the manual-winding Omega Caliber 321. The movement provides a power reserve suitable for daily wear. The watch is fitted with a hesalite crystal, a characteristic material for chronographs of its era. The case dimensions reflect the design preferences of the period, offering a balanced presence on the wrist. The construction emphasizes durability and legibility, consistent with its intended function as a robust timing instrument.
For collectors, the ST105.003 holds particular appeal due to its position in the lineage of the model. Its specific dial, bezel, and case configurations are distinct from subsequent references, making it a focal point for those interested in the historical progression of the series. Variants within this reference are primarily related to minor production changes over its manufacturing period, which are closely studied by enthusiasts seeking to understand the nuances of early production examples. It is valued for its historical accuracy and its representation of an important developmental phase.
If i want a modern speedy, i would choose this here:
I guess those trade 18-30k?
In the seventies, in Madrid, I won a brand new Speedmaster (first watch to the moon, etc.) playing cards. In the eighties, I was stupid enough to trade it for a 1949 Rolex Oyster. Iβve missed the old Speedmaster since. Now I own a new one, the one in the big box, but itβs certainly not the same by any means. Noticing the launch of the new 321, Iβm left cold. So many Speedmasters of all colors, sizes, and tattooed dials and backs, somehow demerits the old guy. If only I would have kept my old Spe
And it's not even a close call. I mean, the original is not made anymore, and the new one will be there for years. An original in a good condition would easily be my pick, even if the reedition is nice.
I have 2 original Ed Whites Nicolas, one is pristine and untouched condition, and I am still excited to get the new re-edition as I explained in another thread. The problem with the vintage piece is replacement parts, damage, etc... That is the advantage of the re-edition. So if anyone will be wearing the watch often, I would think the re-edition is a better choice. If someone wants to collect an Ed White and wear it on occasion than the better choice is the vintage piece. BUT the BEST choice is
so for me I prefer modern watches more than vintage watches. I guess I am more an enthusiast who likes to wear a variety or watches than a collector who has more focus or has a theme for their collection π€·ββοΈπ€ͺ
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 34 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
