
れい seeks expert opinions on his Omega Speedmaster Professional 105.012, specifically regarding its chrono hand and the distinction between it and the 145.012. This inquiry opens a valuable discussion on the nuances of vintage Speedmaster references, including dial variations, hand originality, and movement adjustments.
Guys, does this look right? It has the later chrono hand, but according to an article, the last period's 4th version had the later chrono hand type.
Also, what's the difference between this model and 145.012?
Thank you all in advance!

the 105.012 is the first model to have a professional dial with applied Omega symbol. take a look at my previous post omega.watchprosite.com i appreciate from the pic you've given us the dials lume looks to be in excellent condition, but that could be due to several reasons like being kept in a box and not worn very often. the dial is the correct style for the model, the hands look very good and have possibly been replaced. its hard to find pieces with original hands these days and they only hav
These are getting expensive now
Nice indeed! But I need cal 321 version as well...
This is my 105.012 from 1963, the first year of production. It sports the initials A.C.P. on the dial, for Automovil Club del Peru. At the bottom it simply says "Swiss Made" without any reference to tritium.
Thanks. But no "T SWISS MADE T" is it intentional?
Rei, i was going to comment on this 1963 'pro' model yesterday, but the kids were here and i was forcd to drive an Xbox :) my comment would have read that it is possible or even quite likely that this dial is a slightly later than original addition. the reason i have for saying that is all based on the research i did when i bought my 1964 105.012. as far as i could assertain late 64 dials were pretty much the first to have professional on them and they werent in mainstream issue until 1965 so a
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →