Collection
Nicolas, known as amanico on WatchProSite, presents a captivating comparison between two distinct versions of the Omega Speedmaster 2998: the black and white, and the previously featured blue and white. His original post, enriched with both official press images and his personal photographs taken at Omega's Bienne headquarters, invites collectors to consider the subtle yet significant differences that make these watches complementary rather than redundant. This exploration delves into the aesthetic nuances that define each reference, prompting a crucial question for enthusiasts: which one to acquire?
The Omega Nautilus reference CK2998 is a specific model within the Omega lineup. This reference is identified by its unique alphanumeric designation.
No verifiable details regarding the case, materials, crystal, or movement are provided in the input facts or the collector's post.
This reference appeals to collectors interested in specific Omega models identified by their reference numbers. Its position within the broader Omega collection is defined by its individual reference.
If I had both in my watch box, I might be reaching out to the b
If I would not have the blue variant,then this one would be very welcome in my collection.
But my next plans are more on consolidation of the collection than expansion. Getting older forces me to make choicesβ¦.
I would vote for the blue. The b&w is more legible but screams a little too much. I would wear the blue one on a dark blue cordovan. An Omega FOIS is on my potential list, but with the traditional all black dial.
.. and surprisingly the watch that gets more wrist time is the Black π and was the watch I took with me when i visited Omega in Biel/Bienne last year. Here are couple of postcards.... Best of health !
Did Blue gather more votes than Black at that time ? Oh well...
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 36 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
