Omega Speedmaster 145.012-67 SP Patina & Restoration
Vintage

Omega Speedmaster 145.012-67 SP Patina & Restoration

By iEdi · Mar 7, 2009 · 20 replies
iEdi
WPS member · Omega forum
20 replies4900 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

iEdi's detailed inquiry into a vintage Omega Speedmaster Ref. 145.012-67 SP offers a masterclass in evaluating the authenticity and condition of historical timepieces. His questions about dial patina, case-back markings, and restoration ethics remain highly relevant for collectors navigating the complexities of the vintage market today. This discussion underscores the enduring value of original components and informed decision-making in preserving horological heritage.

Hi !

Just a few pics and some questions. Enjoy the pics and please tell me what do you think.











And the questions part smile

1. What do you think about the condition of the dial and hands ? What I mean is that I have never seen before a 145.012 with such a nice patina on the dial...

2. Very important : what do you think about the case-back ? As far as I know the ref no. should be "145.012- 67 SP", but here "67" is missing (the serial number on the movement is scrambled and I apologize for that, but it places the watch in 1967 for sure). And what is the meaning of the stamped "3" , "4" and "MH" ?

3. What do you think about restoring this watch ? What I mean is that as far as I can see, most people are restoring this kind of watches (new set of hands, new bezel, new case, new see-thru case-back), but I see a blasphemy in modifying the original design.

4. I'm really considering just a movement service and I want to let the external parts untouched (with all the signs of time on it, including the scratches). What do you think about that ?

Any input will be of great help.

Best,
Eddie

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Mar 8, 2009

That I know nothing about Speeds... But I wouldn't touch the dial, as the Patina is maginficient. It gives a lot of warnth and charm to this Speed, IMO, and I don't see why it would not be authentic. But my knowledge is very limited on Speeds. Best, Nicolas

IE
iEdi
Mar 8, 2009

I wait for the others to comment on it. Allow me to say that I'm not worried about it's authenticity (is very clear to me that is authentic), I'm not worried about anything, but I'm very curious about what I have asked.

G9
G99
Mar 8, 2009

the dial is nicely patinated and looks original, very well looked after. i would leave it exactly as it is. it is possible its a replacement early on in the watches life so that its patinated, but in such good condition. something you;'ll never know. the hands look too good and are probably later replacements during a factory service. the bezel is good and should be left. the case outside would benefit from a very light scratch removal and the old gaskets cleaned off and replaced. nothing too dr

IE
iEdi
Mar 8, 2009

Thanks a lot Graham ! That's a very complete point of view and is of great help. I was thinking about the same, except the light polish and the replaced hands. The hands must have been replaced very early, as they are showing some patina. About the numbers and letters written on the interior of the case-back I don't know what to think, but I think you are right. The movement will be serviced indeed. Kind regards, Eddie

G9
G99
Mar 8, 2009

they look very white. i cant upload pics at the moment or i would show you my 64 speedy which is only 3 years older. the good thing is that the hands didnt change from your model all the way through to today so even if they are newish they are correct. best Graham

G9
G99
Mar 9, 2009

you can see that the white is darkened and the lume inside it is much darker. original or replacements, your hands are correct for the model which is by far the most important thing. best Graham

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Omega forum with 20 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →