
Myles721's original post offers a compelling visual comparison of two significant Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean chronographs, prompting a deeper look into their design evolution and on-wrist presence. This article delves into the nuances of these robust dive watches, exploring what makes each reference a distinctive choice for collectors. Myles721's insights, alongside community contributions, illuminate the practical considerations of owning such substantial timepieces.



It is rugged and great!
By any chance do you know the Deepsea, only asking to read your comparaisons if possible.
A perpetual comparison of Ferrari vs Lamborghini...why did I buy this watch!?!...a worthy question! The pushers can be used at depth ...no screw down! The 9300 movement. I love that it can be used as a dual time zone and time two things at once!...the only competitor with these credentials?.....Sinn!
. . . turned up a PO chrono that belonged to one of his friends. Earlier than yours by many years but still a massive chunk of precision Swiss steel! Art
In fact I did not ask my question well, of course the 2 watches are not part of an identical category. Since the 2 watches are almost the same size, I especially wanted to know in terms how it seats on the wrist. For example because of its head weight and bracelet I find that the Deepsea often tilts too far forward. So my question is, how does this Seamaster sits on the wrist, is it stable...? Thank your for time.
If there isn’t too much play in the bracelet then it sits fairly comfortably on your wrist with not too much movement… It is a heavy watch but considering that it’s pretty snug. The Sea Dweller is one thing... but I can almost guarantee you it’s more stable than a Deep Sea.
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →