
Clueless_Collector's post serves as a timely reminder that while Omega's Moonwatch often dominates the conversation, the Seamaster family holds an equally significant, if not more diverse, place in horological history and popular culture. This discussion highlights the Seamaster's broad appeal, from its technical prowess and design versatility to its iconic association with cinematic legends. It underscores why the Seamaster remains a cornerstone of Omega's legacy, offering collectors a compelling alternative to its lunar-faring sibling.


It is IMPOSSIBLE for me to choose between them. I do wish however regardless of the iteration or movement that all Speedmasters will one day have a minimum depth rating of 100 meters.
Iโll be wearing my watches is washing my hands ๐
I have had the moon watch three times,two times I went into the pool by mistake,nothing happened but didnโt wanted to try again
I thought I read somewhere 30m is good enough for swimming.
Iโve never worn one like that.
Some people felt itโs uncomfortable but it depend which hole you put it. Overall, I like itโs lightweight and comfort.
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 48 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →