Review
Mach's original post on the new Omega Seamaster 300 sparked a lively discussion among collectors, highlighting the subtle yet significant updates to this iconic reference. His initial impressions, focusing on the sandwich dial, lollipop seconds hand, and updated bracelet, provide a valuable starting point for understanding how these design choices resonate with the WatchProSite community. This article synthesizes the collective insights, offering a comprehensive look at the new Seamaster 300 through the eyes of its most passionate enthusiasts.
The Seamaster 300 reference is a re-edition that draws inspiration from Omega's historical dive watches. It is characterized by its robust construction and design elements that pay homage to early professional timepieces, while incorporating modern watchmaking advancements. This reference is positioned as a contemporary interpretation for enthusiasts who appreciate vintage aesthetics combined with current performance standards.
This particular Seamaster 300 features a stainless steel case, typically measuring 41 mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, often a Master Co-Axial caliber, providing a substantial power reserve. The watch is fitted with a domed sapphire crystal, contributing to its vintage appearance while offering enhanced scratch resistance. Its construction ensures a high degree of water resistance suitable for aquatic activities.
For collectors, this reference appeals to those seeking a blend of historical design and modern technical specifications. It represents Omega's commitment to its heritage while offering a reliable and well-engineered timepiece. The Seamaster 300 is a significant part of the brand's contemporary collection, offering a distinct alternative to other models within the Seamaster family.
to the leather strap version and blue dial. I adore that watch, and i want it.
It turned a watch I'd decided I wasn't interested in into... a watch I'm interested in.
And the lollipop too. And what about the “bronze” version. That looks super interesting too. 41mm puts these outside my interest though.
The overall look of the earlier version is pleasing. By owning and wearing it, I have found: 1. the back clasp could be trimmed down a little. 2. the metal ring inside the ceramic bezel can get dents if you are not careful. That means the bezel does not protect the metal ring. It is probably the ring protecting the sapphire glass. 3. the bezel is unidirectional but it is too loose. Finally, the accuracy was very good in the first 6 months. I do not remember if it ran fast or slow. It was not as
The sandwich dial is gorgeous. I like the depth of this technique. Honestly I like the usefulness of a date function, and wish this version had a date window at 6 o’clock. I know it distracts from the “purity” of the design but function comes before form, for me. I may get this piece in the future, but there are other pieces I can think of: 1) GO SeaQ 39.5mm version (weighing antimagnetism of the omega vs the finesse of the GO movement) 2) JLC Polaris Date (priced way above this, but not antimag
Not a fan of the hour hand nor of numerals in general but find myself thinking this watch "as a whole" is very appealing. Cheers Marc
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 31 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
