Service
Dr No shares the journey of his friend Riley's 1959 Omega Seamaster, recently returned from Omega service. This post highlights the challenges and decisions involved in restoring a vintage timepiece, particularly concerning original parts versus modern replacements. Dr No's detailed account and accompanying photos offer valuable insights into the complexities collectors face when seeking authenticity and functionality.
. . . and while the movement wasn't in bad shape, Omega returned all the parts that were replaced, which included a couple of wheels, crystal, hands, mainspring, pinions, and screws.
and the case is terrific. I agree with you concerning the hands, Art. Best regards, Tony
Shame that they wouldn't touch the bracelet. I seriously think a competent jeweler could repair it. I've seen wonders done with damaged lugs> I do prefer the older gold hands. These look stainless This message has been edited by mrsnak on 2010-08-20 13:36:43
. . . but the lume crevice is notably smaller compared to the originals. Fortunately, there's a specialist in this type of work locally, and he performed reasonably good work on my '56 Longines . . . cordially, Art
. . . he could've had it performed locally, but this way, there's no regrets over a possibly botched job. He's ordered the certificate of authenticity, too; now all he needs is someone to fix the clasp on the two-tone bracelet, and he'll have quite a rarity on his hands. Cordially, Art
Art, i like the pic showing Omega symbol inscribed in the replacement crystal. i have few vintage Omega watches that also such symbol inscribed in the crystal. i find it very fascinating. Omega should consider to maintain this feature for the modern watches. by the way, i hope Riley likes his Seamaster although replacing the bracelet with leather strap. thanks for sharing. stefan
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 27 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
