LVMH Buys Tiffany: Patek Philippe Implications
Market

LVMH Buys Tiffany: Patek Philippe Implications

By @Patek_Ambassador · Nov 25, 2019 · 21 replies
@Patek_Ambassador
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
21 replies5589 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

LVMH announced they are buying Tiffany today for $16.2bn. Here is a bit on the Patek angle of the Tiffany relationship: Ever since the rumor of this deal surfaced, there has been chatter within the community about what it might mean for watches – or more directly, if the transaction will change the

21 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
LVMH announced they are buying Tiffany today for $16.2bn. Here is a bit on the Patek angle of the Tiffany relationship:


www.hodinkee.com

Ever since the rumor of this deal surfaced, there has been chatter within the community about what it might mean for watches – or more directly, if the transaction will change the relationship Tiffany



Advertisement
The Discussion
FA
FabR
Nov 25, 2019
So Hodinkee has been bought by Bloomberg?

It’s amazing how they periodically still get back to this obsession of Patek being on sale, even after no shred of evidence was ever produced, and Mr Stern had to offer countless unequivocal denials after Bloomberg’s damaging fake news. Now the conspiracy theory is even expanding: if Patek allows Tiffany to keep co-signing its dials, maybe Patek itself is planning to sell to LVMH...🤦‍♂️🚑 I’m not sure if Tiffany will continue to co-sign Patek, but what I’m certain about is that we won’t see a Pat

CH
ChristianDK
Nov 25, 2019
Hodinkee have never been very concerned with facts

It’s a business who sells clicks. Your post echoes my thoughts.

FA
FabR
Nov 25, 2019
Indeed, but when they continue to spread rumors by pretending to give credibility to a well-known fake news outlet like Bloomberg, they have to realize that the damage to Patek's reputation can become significant over time.

Hodinkee is still taken seriously be many watch collectors, so I believe they have a moral obligation to maintain standards well above Bloomberg or the like. And I'm sure they understand they have much more to lose than Patek by going down this route...the last thing Hodinkee wants is to develop a reputation of "fake watch news", which would be nearly impossible to recover from. So this is obviously their decision, but I still hope they'll choose to correct that part of today's article in a time

JA
Jay (Eire)
Nov 25, 2019
The other side of this *might* be...

...it’s good for new watch buyers whom may be “investing” substantial sums of money into a Patek to at least consider what the future might hold and how that might impact their “investment”. (Yes, I’m sure there are readers of H that will put substantial sums of money into their collections, and that information or opinions gathered on H will influence those purchases. I also don’t want to ignore that many people will invest in Patek by purchasing a watch). With all that said do we think it’s OK

FA
FabR
Nov 25, 2019
Hi Jay, I totally agree it's good to be as informed as possible on a company we buy from and, in a sense, we invest in...

Even though I buy Pateks primarily for passion, I have no problem to admit I've happily "invested" quite a bit of my money in those cute watches, so I also love to hear how the brand is doing. If there's any significant news or development worth reporting, it's only good that reputable sources share it with the collectors community. However, I believe the concern here should be on a broader point. This latest rumor originated with a Bloomberg article where, for whichever motive, they revived the

SP
Spangles - Dr. Tabby
Nov 25, 2019
Interesting to see the rumor of PP being sold given such solid credence. [nt]

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →