
Ronald Held's original post sparks a fascinating discussion about the transparency of watch manufacturers, specifically regarding the weight of their timepieces. Held questions why this seemingly basic specification isn't universally provided, including the strap or bracelet. This inquiry delves into broader industry practices and consumer expectations for detailed product information.

Like many things that one could measure, this is a discretionary item. It's like (in the automotive realm): range of travel forward and back of the driver's seat maximum size of tire that can be fitted w/o rubbing actual speed of wiper blades Mike
I doubt I am the only one who has weighed their watches. It's relevant. I've also wondered about listing precious metal content.
They've also started listing thickness, lug-to-lug, and lug horn spacing. I take some pride in that ;-) Best, Tim
As someone mentions, it would show an increasing cutting of corners when it comes to the use of precious metals 😉 So quite unlikely. And not sure there’s a watch magazine out there that does this in a standardized way 🤷🏻♂️
Why the "hide" the weight... And why for certain watches, or certain models, you actually have to search for information when the "data" doesn't serve the manufacturer...
Head only, and whole watch including bracelet.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →