Luxury Watch Discussion: Collector Insights
Discussion

Luxury Watch Discussion: Collector Insights

By Clueless_Collector · Jul 24, 2024 · 33 replies
Clueless_Collector
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
33 replies2004 views1 photos
f ๐• in ๐Ÿ’ฌ โœ‰ ๐Ÿ”—

Clueless_Collector's original post sparks a fascinating discussion on the subtle yet significant role of 'noble' metals in high horology. This exploration moves beyond the common association of nobility with luxury, delving into the scientific properties that make these materials indispensable for enduring timepieces. Readers will gain a deeper appreciation for the material science underpinning watchmaking excellence.

These 3 have one thing in common, and is noble.


Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
PA
patrick_y
Jul 24, 2024

FYI, for those whom are not familiar. Noble here does not mean that the metal is worthy of nobility, royals, etc. "Noble" metals means that these metals are not generally reactive - meaning they won't oxidize, rust, or react chemically with just about anything else. For example, noble gases, have a full electron shell and thus do not react to other atoms.

CL
Clueless_Collector
Jul 24, 2024

I know, seems not making sense because I have the 5960/1A which is similar โ€ฆ the Pt case has some small dings and was due for service, which bothers me. The G version was made in a shorter run and was the last version, newer, appeals to me more.

PA
patrick_y
Jul 24, 2024

The chemistry aspect of noble metals is less obvious. When the word noble first conjures up images of "nobility" and royalty which appears to fit the jewelry context.

GO
Goh
Jul 24, 2024

Poor JB will be stuck with his Seamasters.

AR
ArmisT
Jul 24, 2024

with different number of complications and aesthetic/design features, but with platinum as the common element.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 33 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →