Collection
In this insightful piece, systematic.entropy shares a deeply personal account of refining his watch collecting philosophy. He outlines his journey from broad acquisition to a highly curated 'ideal collection,' emphasizing the critical role of self-imposed constraints. His reflections offer a valuable framework for collectors at any stage, prompting a broader discussion on the motivations and methodologies behind building a meaningful watch collection.
There are a thousand ways to collect, and they are all valid. This specific community displays that clearly, that is what I believe makes WatchProSite such a great community. As far as online communities are concerned, this site exemplifies how varied collectors are in their motivations. The following is my specific experience. I’d love to hear how it differs from yours or any additional insights anyone may wish to provide.
Many years ago, after already been collecting for several years, I decided on a specific watch collection that I wanted to have. This wasn't simply a check the boxes process. Based on my experiences up to that point, I put a lot of thought into all the objective aspects of the pieces that I had and kept and the pieces out there that appealed to me. I had honed my taste and decided to move towards this vision. I forget exactly what I had at the time, some of them were already in this "ideal collection", but that "ideal collection" was this;
With this roadmap in mind, I purged a lot of what I currently owned that was not part of this vision. Later, I would describe this as a constraint. I have found that acknowledging constraints is very important in sticking to the plan. The most obvious constraint, for most of us is financial. Even so, establishing other constraints like staying exclusively with one brand or only having one watch per brand, or all steel, or all gold, etc.. At the time, my paramount constraint was financial. I parted with a lot of what I had acquired. There were some regrets. But, regret over losing say, a Breitling Superocean Steelfish, was overcome knowing that whatever value it offered TO ME, would be eclipsed by the value something else provided within the “vision”.
I believe this is at the heart of refining taste. It’s extremely helpful to precisely identify WHAT it is that you like about a particular watch, to see if it exists elsewhere. This also helps when it comes to scratching that new watch bug. Knowing the qualities that I enjoy allow me to identify what was still absent in my collection and what could serve as an enjoyable placeholder until the ideal was possible. It also allowed me to easily leave the placeholder when the ideal was a possibility. It’s counter intuitive, but this approach of working within defined constraints actually facilitates gathering experience. Knowing what I like allowed me to have watches come in and out that have those qualities, and would often bring additional qualities that I may not have been aware of. For example, I was aspiring to a JLC Extreme Lab 2 because of the level of complication; GMT, chrono, etc.. However, when I had the opportunity to pick up a Panerai 317, I know it held some of the same technical qualities as the JLC. I picked up the Panerai and in having the Panerai, I gained an appreciation for the lightness and durability of ceramic cases. The Panerai both served as a stepping stone and a new gain of experience.
Over the next couple of years, this ideal was what I progressed towards. There were several fleeting interests on the way. Eventually, I hit the mark, and found myself having my ideal collection. Was I happy? Yes. Was I satisfied? Well… collectors are seldom satisfied. I still found myself wanting another watch outside the qualities defined by the plan. Why was this? Likely, it was because I had been exposed to a lot of new qualities along the way to completing my mission, my tastes had changed and now my constraints had changed.
The year that followed was very liberating. Having achieved the plan, I was free to totally venture outside the lines. Unfortunately, as wiser individuals have said,
“Fail to plan, plan to fail”
The PAM317 represents Panerai's approach to combining multiple complications within the Luminor 1950 series. This reference integrates chronograph, GMT, and extended power reserve functions in a ceramic construction, distinguishing it from standard time-only models in the collection.
The 44mm ceramic case houses the Calibre P.2004 movement and features a ceramic bezel with sapphire crystal protection. The case material extends to both the main body and bezel construction, creating a monochromatic appearance. Water resistance reaches 100 meters, while the movement provides the chronograph and GMT complications indicated in the model designation.
This reference appeals to collectors seeking technical complications within Panerai's contemporary offerings. The ceramic case material and multi-function movement position the PAM317 as a more complex alternative to basic Luminor models, targeting enthusiasts who prioritize both material innovation and mechanical sophistication in their collecting focus.
Using this reply title to make clear that collecting with a philosophy is philosophic. A kind of Shakespeare. I like the word constraint. Your words financial constraint is well known to almost everybody, except some very rich billionaires at watch communities. On you tube there is a limitless watch collector who acquire every very expensive watch. In our situation we select more precieze. We can not buy 10 brand new RM’s and 5 F.P. Journes in a blink of an eye. If we buy an entry level Omega Sp
I had many watch I thought I wanted, until I actually got them and did not get any joy of wearing them for some reason! Overtime this got refined and trying to narrow my focus now with the possible exception here and there…cheers
I have said that my collection is at an “inflection point” and can relate. I’m not sure what’s next, consolidation (perhaps), expansion (perhaps), or the former followed by the latter (probably). I guess that the more I see, the more I question what I like, and what I’m more or less inclined to commit to in terms of wrist time and money. Thanks for sharing and best of luck trying to figure it all out.
It's also the most difficult thing. Sometimes, it's only after we buy a watch that we realize we didn't really like this aspect of it. And the more watches we accumulate, the better we know ourselves. Our 'experience' increases, one might say. One of my constraints is a moral one. Each time I buy a watch, part of me feels guilty that I've (yet again) succumbed to vulgar materialism. How I wish we could imbue our watches with qualities like 'courage' or 'innocence', and acquire those constraint
Always appreciate your kind words.
I am pretty sure that's where I am at. I have a couple "small" things on the way... But, I already know what won't last... and I have one big thing in mind that I am pretty sure will be another lifer.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 12 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
