
Chromatic Fugue delves into the concept of a 'two-watch collection,' inspired by Ben Clymer's choices, and shares his own journey to acquiring an A. Lange & Söhne 1815 Chronograph and a Patek Philippe 3940. He articulates how these two pieces, representing distinct horological traditions and complications, form a complementary and deeply satisfying duo, prompting the community to consider their own ideal minimalist collections.

The Patek Philippe Reference 5140 is a perpetual calendar wristwatch, succeeding the highly regarded Reference 3940. It maintains the classic Patek Philippe perpetual calendar layout, featuring day, date, month, leap year, and moon phase indications. The 5140 was introduced with a slightly larger case diameter than its predecessor, reflecting contemporary preferences while retaining a traditional aesthetic.
This reference is powered by the ultra-thin self-winding Caliber 240 Q, known for its micro-rotor construction which allows for a slender case profile. The movement provides a power reserve of 48 hours. The watch is presented in 18k white gold, rose gold, or yellow gold cases, measuring 39 mm in diameter, and is fitted with a sapphire crystal. It offers water resistance to 30 meters.
The 5140 appeals to collectors seeking a modern perpetual calendar with a direct lineage to Patek Philippe's established complications. Its production run from 2006 to 2019 saw various dial configurations, including opaline and silvery finishes. The watch is typically paired with a leather strap and a deployant clasp, consistent with Patek Philippe's classic offerings.
No question the two you have are one the best representative in their respective category. Like you, I prefer the 1815 Chrono and I have yet to find my dream PC because I intend to own just 1 of each complication to avoid redundancy but ironically we own many watches that tell time. Honestly I cannot just have 2 watches only, let’s not kid ourselves here, haha....For me, I need a bracelet watch at least as a daily beater. You can list it by complication or functions: 1. Mechanical Chrono - dress
interesting... Ben Clymer owns a Philippe Dufour he neither choose it nor the speedy that was a gift from his grandfather (which was eventually the story behind start of H) ! may be his thoughts were not for his own 2 watch collection ;-) Best, mahesh.,
They fully participated in the move to quartz movements and made a hell of a lot of money doing so. The two watches you chose for a “two watch “ collection are as worthy as any two you could pick. But your very choices prove that a two watch collection is unachievable. Neither are appropriate for so many normal activities; beaching, hiking, golfing, getting drunk, throwing a ball, sexing or anything that can lead to sweating. You absolutely need a bracelet watch and steel watch you don’t mind sc
Your choice is absolutes brilliant and easy to understand. Both of the watches can hardly be topped, and they represent Swiss and German watchmaking at its very, very best. I made my choice the other way round: a perpetual calendar from Lange and a chrono from Patek...
I love your photography and your reasoning behind choosing this pair as a perfect 2 watch collection. Personally, I would also choose the 1815 Chrono over the Datograph as well. This for sure is a dynamic duo but I can’t imagine living without at least one steel sports watch. If you had to pick one sports watch to complement the Lange
So are Bulgari, Omega and Grand Seiko who appointed them as AD?
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 42 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →