JLC Geophysic: Which Size is Your Favorite?

amanico · 2017-02-10T00:58:19Z

Explore Jaeger-LeCoultre Geophysic sizes: Tribute, True Second, Universal Time. Which modern JLC Geophysic size is best for collectors?

amanico

WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum

59 replies18269 views4 photos

Amanico initiates a crucial discussion on the modern Jaeger-LeCoultre Geophysic line, inviting collectors to debate the optimal case size for these contemporary interpretations. By comparing the Tribute, True Second, Universal Time, and Tourbillon Universal Time models, he highlights the challenge of balancing historical charm with modern wearability, making this a valuable resource for potential buyers.

59 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

All is in the title.

With the Tribute, Jaeger Lecoultre tried to achieve a compromise: Keeping the spirit and the charm of the original case, and modernizing it, with a more acceptable size for the current market ( The original is 35 mm big, hich is fine for me ).

So, the Tribute is 38, 5 mm big, and 11, 3 mm high.

The True Second is one millimeter bigger ( 39, 6 mm ) and 11, 8 mm high.

41, 6 mm for the Universal Time, and same height than for the True Second.

The Tourbillon Universal Time is much bigger: 43, 5 mm / 14, 9 mm.

I find that the maximum in terms of dimensions is around 41 / 42 mm. With a height which should not go over 11, 8 mm / 12, mm, if the Geophysic case wants to keep this macho elegance which is so characteristic.

What is your take?

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

The original Geophysic was 35mm, while the modern Tribute is 38.5mm, the True Second is 39.6mm, and the Universal Time is 41.6mm, with the Tourbillon Universal Time being the largest at 43.5mm.
The author believes the ideal dimensions for the Geophysic case to maintain its 'macho elegance' are around 41-42mm in diameter and not exceeding 11.8-12mm in height.
The Tribute to 1958 model is often considered perfect at 38.5mm, with its white, open dial making it appear larger and very wearable, while the True Second is praised for its size but criticized for the date complication.
One collector found the True Second's case slightly too large and its dial too severe, preferring the Tribute for its perfect fit and design.
The Universal Time model, despite its 41.6mm size, wears smaller due to its dial's color gradation, which draws the eye to the darker center.
Some collectors, like Sentarex, love the case size and shape of the World Time but consider the 1958 Tribute a modern-day legend, despite preferring watches 40mm and above.

The Discussion

Ares501 - Mr Green

Feb 10, 2017

First one hands down ;) [nt]

Bounce781

Feb 10, 2017

If the True Second did not have a date window then that one.

Otherwise, the original

amanico

Feb 10, 2017

You mean the Tribute or the vintage, when you say " original "? [nt]

VMM

Feb 10, 2017

Tribute first.

Then, the others. I like them all. It wouldn't be easy to say no to any of them anyway. Love the movement in the True Seconds, so appealing. Vte

amanico

Feb 10, 2017

Agreed on the Cal 770 / 772. I am not a fan of automatic movements, but this one is an excellent exception. [nt]

mahesh

Feb 10, 2017

always...the original

true seconds without a date window if that happens. Best, mahesh.,

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 59 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

JLC Geophysic: Which Size is Your Favorite?

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

Related Articles