
India Whiskey Charlie's original post introduces the IWC Pilot's Watch Mark XX, a significant release that continues the brand's iconic pilot's watch lineage. This article delves into the community's initial reactions and expert insights regarding its specifications, design choices, and the intriguing numbering convention that has long fascinated collectors. Readers will gain a deeper understanding of how this new reference fits into the esteemed Mark series.






I had a Mark XV, which I miss. They should have stopped there, or even arguably with the Mark XII.
I don’t follow the Mark closely so my knowledge of the history of this model is limited, but I’m curious to know why IWC skipped over XIX. IIRC, the Mark went from XII to XV, skipping 13 and 14 as I understand it because these numbers are considered either unlucky or undesirable in some cultures (not sure if this is accurate or not). Thus, while there is clearly precedent for IWC skipping numbers with the Mark, I’m wondering why they did so in this instance, so I did some poking around into the
I have the XVI and I think it's a candidate for a perfect daily wearer. A sleek 39mm case, robust and accurate movement, and timeless design. It holds its own against any of my Rolex watches.
The bastard child of the Mark series? From 2012 - 41 mm
That is a move we all wait for Nico.
I hear IWC will be releasing a new Ingenieur soon. I wonder if it will have the same movement.
This thread is active on the IWC forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →