
India Whiskey Charlie's original post sparks a perennial debate among luxury watch collectors: the date complication. While IWC models are featured, the discussion transcends brands, delving into aesthetic preferences, practical considerations, and the subtle design nuances that elevate or detract from a watch's overall appeal. This article synthesizes community insights on why the presence or absence, and crucially, the execution of a date window, continues to be a significant factor for enthusiasts.
but my eyes are no longer good enough to read it from a watch dial unless I am wearing my glasses. I have a general preference for no date, but I acknowledge that some watches look better with dates. I have no problem buying and wearing those, but I never set their dates.
No date but they are becoming scares.
Also like the blue numerals on the no date watch.
But since practical reasons are often secondary in our hobby (nobody needs a watch to know the date or even to tell the time...), I'm casting a no-date vote for most (but not all) watches that I can think of. For certain, when the date is present, it *must* fit in nicely with the rest of the dial...something that hardly happens, for instance, with a window at 4.30 ;-) Enjoy.
I still remember the disappointment I felt in seeing the Portuguese 75th anniversary, after seeing the disastrous result caused by the date. Without that date, I would have bought it immediately... Hard problem to solve! Best, massi
and on occasion the day of the week... more so since I stopped my formal 7:30-5:00 job. but it must be large enough to read without a magnifier... Casey Small seconds are nice... .
This thread is active on the IWC forum with 53 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →