Collection
Nicolas (amanico) presents a captivating look at the Girard Perregaux 1966 White Gold with an Enamel Dial, a timepiece he praises for its pure aesthetic. His post invites readers to appreciate the watch's understated beauty while also prompting a discussion around design choices that impact horological perception. This article synthesizes community insights on movement sizing and case back preferences within high-horology collecting.
The Girard Perregaux 1966 reference, issued in 2014, represents a specific iteration within the brand's 1966 collection, known for its classic design language. This particular model features a friendly complication, distinguishing it from simpler time-only variants within the same series. The 1966 line generally emphasizes traditional watchmaking aesthetics and proportions, appealing to those who appreciate understated horology.
The watch is housed in a case characteristic of the 1966 series. It typically features a sapphire crystal, offering clarity and scratch resistance. The movement powering this reference is an automatic caliber, consistent with Girard Perregaux's in-house manufacturing capabilities, providing a reliable power reserve suitable for daily wear.
For collectors, this reference offers a less commonly seen variant of the 1966 collection. Its appeal lies in its adherence to classical design principles and the inclusion of a practical complication. While specific dial and hand configurations can be subjects of discussion among enthusiasts, the overall presentation aligns with the brand's heritage in precision watchmaking.
And yes, the size of the movement is a well-known „GP issue“, even with their most beautiful watches…
This watch is beautiful. Simple watch, enamel dial with breguet numeral. The movement is maybe a little bit small but (similarly to 5196P?) the breguet numeral on the dial side somehow give an harmony to the placement of the small second. No “eaten 6” will please some… Full agreement that a nice plain back would have hidden that small default. What to say more than “beautiful watch”?
I see your point and would have seen the solid case back as a good solution. In the front they did a good job of hiding the too small movement 👍🏻
Sometimes it is a good idea to just look at the dial and forget about the movement altogether. Marc
Didn't use the bigger calibre for these bigger cases. The cal 4500 (30 mm) would eventually evolve to become the cal 1800.
This thread is active on the Girard Perregaux forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
