Seiko 6105-8009 vs. Doxa 300 Searambler

Bill · 2018-09-02T14:39:46Z

Explore a vintage Seiko 6105-8009 and Doxa 300 Searambler comparison. Bill's post highlights design, historical pricing, and collecting insights.

Bill's post offers a fascinating comparison between a vintage Seiko diver and a modern Doxa re-edition, both inspired by late 1960s designs. His detailed photos highlight the aesthetic similarities and subtle differences, inviting collectors to appreciate the evolution and enduring appeal of these iconic dive watches. This comparison is particularly valuable for understanding design influences across different brands and eras.

Here you can really see the design similarity on these dive watches.

However the swiss one in this case is the re edition of the Searambler circa 1968 just released in 2018.

The Seiko is the original and rare 6105-8009 with the resist - resist feature meanng it has resit on the dial and water resist on the case back. Also feature the thin case like the 1965 62mas.

Enjoy

Doxa 300 no T searambler 2018 vs seiko 6105-8009 1969

Below is the original 1965 Seiko 62mas both big and little crown.

Key Points from the Discussion

When looking for a vintage Seiko 6105, prioritize original dials and hands, but note that unlike Rolex, there's more latitude for variations without significant consequence. The 'turtle' cushion case is the most common and features a crown-protecting shoulder, while earlier 'proof-proof' and 'resist-resist' models have thinner cases.
The original Doxa 300 'no T' also featured a thin case, distinguishing it from the later, thicker Doxa 300T models.
A personal anecdote highlights the longevity of vintage Seiko watches, with a Sea Lion from 1966 passed down through generations, though it eventually required servicing for winding system wear.
A collector inquired about key considerations when acquiring a used Seiko 6105, specifically asking what to look out for.
Historical pricing data shows a 1965 Seiko 62MAS retailed for approximately 13,000 yen (around $45 in 1975), while a 1967 Rolex 5513 was $160, and a 1968 Doxa 300 was $165, offering 300 meters of water resistance for a comparable or lower price than the Rolex's 200 meters.
The market for vintage sports models has significantly increased in price over the past 3-5 years due to rising demand.
Another collector shared an image of their own Seiko 6105, noting it was a 'Proof' rather than 'Resist' dial variant.

The Discussion

renerod

Sep 2, 2018

Interesting comparison Bill

I love them both, though I feel a little biased towards the Seiko. Don’t know why Best. René

Bill

Sep 2, 2018

What i like is these brands were there early on.

The Seiko was rated to 150 meters and tye Roles was 200 meters and the Doxa was rated at 300 meters but was less expensive than the Rolex at $165 back in 1968. I need to see what tye Seiko dold for in 1968.

renerod

Sep 2, 2018

Doxa and Seiko have always given best value for money

But Rolex is dear to my heart ❤️ I hope I can get a vintage one someday. Thanks for sharing all this interesting info Bill. Best. René

Bill

Sep 2, 2018

The Seiko 62mas was around $45 in 1965

1965 Seiko 62mas 13,000 yen approximately $45 based on 1975 exchange rate.

renerod

Sep 2, 2018

And this ad from 1965 is really good! [nt]

Dr No

Sep 3, 2018

That's exactly what Dad remembers paying . . .

. . . for his Seiko Sea Lion in January '66. Pops wore it practically every day for decades before handing it down to yours truly; my previous watchmaker diagnosed excessive wear in the winding system, but never got around to fixing it. It's due for a visit to my current watchmaker. Art

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation