Dress Watch Comparison: Chopard, Patek, JLC
Discussion

Dress Watch Comparison: Chopard, Patek, JLC

By anon_442182 · Oct 19, 2019 · 54 replies
anon_442182
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
54 replies5618 views1 photos
f ๐• in ๐Ÿ’ฌ โœ‰ ๐Ÿ”—

Anon_442182 presents a compelling 'Three On Three' comparison of dress watches, featuring the Chopard L.U.C 1860, Patek Philippe Calatrava 3796S, and Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Ultra Thin Tribute To 1931. This post sparks a vibrant community discussion on the definition of a perfect dress watch, weighing versatility, elegance, and historical significance.

54 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Left to Right

#1 Chopard L.U.C 1860, 16/1860/2
#2 Patek Philippe Calatrava, 3796S
#3 Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Ultra Thin Tribute To 1931, Q2788570

Which one do you choose?



About the Chopard L.U.C Ref. L.U.C1860

The L.U.C 1860 reference is a notable offering within the L.U.C collection, distinguished by its focus on classical watchmaking principles and refined aesthetics. This particular model, introduced at Watches and Wonders 2023, represents a continuation of Chopard's commitment to high horology, emphasizing traditional craftsmanship and a discreet presentation. It is recognized for its balanced proportions and the integration of a finely finished movement, reflecting the brand's in-house manufacturing capabilities.

This reference features a case crafted from Lucent Steel, a proprietary alloy, measuring 36.5 mm in diameter. The watch is powered by the L.U.C 96.01-L automatic movement, which is visible through a sapphire crystal case back. This movement is equipped with a micro-rotor and offers a power reserve of approximately 65 hours. The dial is presented in a salmon color, complemented by a sapphire crystal on the front.

Appealing to collectors who value understated design and mechanical integrity, the L.U.C 1860 fits into the brand's lineup as a dress watch with significant horological merit. Its limited production and specific material choices contribute to its appeal among enthusiasts seeking a watch that combines traditional watchmaking with contemporary material science. The model is a testament to Chopard's ongoing development in its L.U.C range.

Specifications

Caliber
L.U.C 96.01-L
Case
Lucent Steel
Diameter
36.5mm
Dial
Salmon
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
MI
Mike H
Oct 19, 2019

...personally I donโ€™t hesitate and go for the nice candy 3796. Small is beautiful ๐Ÿ˜‰

ใ‚Œใ„
ใ‚Œใ„
Oct 19, 2019

ๆ–‡ๅญ—็›คใ‚‚้‡ใ‚‚ใ„ใ„ใ‘ใฉๆ—ฅไป˜ใฏใ ใ‚ใงใ™ใญ ๐Ÿ˜† ใใ‚ŒใŒใชใ‘ใ‚ŒใฐๅฎŒ็’งใ ใจๆ€ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใƒ‘ใƒ†ใƒƒใ‚ฏใซใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚็ง’้‡ใ‚‚ไน—ใ›ใ‚‹ใจใ“ใŒใ„ใ„(ใ‚ธใƒฃใƒผใ‚ฌใƒผใฏใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚ทใƒƒใ‚ฏใƒขใƒ‡ใƒซใ ใ‘ใฉใ‚ทใƒณใƒ—ใƒซใ™ใŽ)๏ผŽ๏ผŽ๏ผŽ I prefer the Patek as the balance is perfect.

WA
watchme
Oct 19, 2019

the Reverso - all the way! Why? A rectangular watch peeking out - and parallel to - a shirt cuff is about as elegant as you can get. I find round watches look like half-moon (clumsy). -Dean

RE
Reuven Malter
Oct 19, 2019

This piece is one of my favorite pieces and it reminds me of the time when i first became interested in watches.

BA
batholith
Oct 19, 2019

is such a rare beast that I could only go for it. And beautiful, as well.

AN
anon_442182
Oct 19, 2019

In recent years, the rating of 3796 has been increasing. Especially WG. In Chrono24, 3796 in good condition was reduced.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 54 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →