
Nilomis presents a detailed look at a vintage Breitling from the 1930s or early 1940s, alongside other historical Breitling and Wakmann chronographs. This post offers a rare opportunity to examine early Breitling designs and movements, sparking a rich discussion among collectors about authenticity and historical context.














A BEAUTY! Thanks for sharing. Nicolas.
Since I'm wearing a 44mm Zenith, it feels so small on the wrist. My 4 years old granddaughter, that was "supervising" my photo session, was under the believe that this watch was hers. Cheers, Nilo
All modern nice watches are big. I decided to try and I'm doing well with this size. Otherwise, how I go to dream with a new Amvox? Cheers Nilo
I find myself drawn to these old chronographs from the '20s through the '40s. From your pictures, it looks like the case is quite thin compared to most modern chronographs. I hope the materials revolution eventually leads to the development of thinner hand-wind chronograph movements. In the meantime, the original will suffice!
Collecting pre-40's Breitlings is very difficult for a number of reasons, first they rarely signed their dials, cases or movements in this period and second over the past few years there has been a serious industry in faking or frankening these early Breitling watches. The watch you show is gorgeous, but it begs a lot of questions and I'll say upfront, I'm not sure I have a final solution. There are three things that this watch could be, (A) A very rare and early genuine Breitling, (B) A franken
but I still feel like the blind men holding onto an elephant and trying to describe it. As always I'd be excited to see if anyone else has some more info/thoughts.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 17 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →