
Recently took my father's Aerospace with me to get it serviced here in Vienna. Having had a very positive experience previously, I thought it would be a breeze this time, too. I explained the problem, and they promised to get back to me with the necessary next steps / a cost estimate within a day. W
So I browsed their current collection a bit...
The 1915 monopusher is quite a charming, vintage inspired piece, with some decidedly modern touches. It has their in-house movement, which is thoroughly modern and has a good power reserve. Here it comes in a hand wound variety, which is nice in principle, as the caseback is transparent and this way you get to see more of the movement but the finish is fit for purpose, rather than intricately artistic, so I guess one will not admire the movement on a constant basis. The case also comes in the same thickness as the automatic one (economies of scale?), so it is basically the Breitling01 movement without the rotor and with some other small adaptations.
The strap is nice and very supple, which definitely helps. As for the chrono operation, the pusher is quite hard, when compared to the Chrono One, and requires a good deal of force to operate. It lies flush with the mini crown guard so as not to snag on clothing but I would have prefered a mushroom shaped one on such a tribute piece. The lume is vintage tinted, which I am still not so sure about but the date is simply disturbing - no need for it on a limited edition handwound chrono, IMHO...
The size is exactly the same as with the 1915 but this time with an automatic movement and a much better integrated date.
Offer... Best, Nicolas
You sure you don\'t want to do a bit of freelance consulting in the watch industry? We\'d all be beneficiaries I mean I get the date on serial pieces but why on such limited editions?
Want a date... Best, Nicolas
Who do not want it universally? And even so, for some models quite a fraction of the production ends up here, anyway. Groupthink amongst watch brands?
Actually from a practical point of view, I prefer to have some date information on the dial, but some do it in a more subtle way than others, check the Glashutte chronometer, the Ap15202 or even the Rolex submariner , does the date interrupt the aesthetics or the purity of the watch? What do you think?
But would rarely, if ever check the date on a watch. Actually 95% of the times I check the date is when I am setting the watch, rather than to see what it actually is There are also differing targets with the date design. I guess in terms of visibility a disruptive - say white on a black dial - background is generally good. In terms of harmoniousness of design, less so. For instance most Chopard watches use a date wheel of exactly the same colour as the dial, making the date blend more into the
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 8 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →