Elmar Mock: Apple Watch Threat to Swiss Horology
Discussion

Elmar Mock: Apple Watch Threat to Swiss Horology

By Ornatus-Mundi · Mar 10, 2015 · 77 replies
Ornatus-Mundi
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
77 replies24297 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Elmar Mock, co-inventor of the Swatch, offered a stark warning to the Swiss watch industry in 2015, predicting an 'ice age' due to the Apple Watch. Ornatus-Mundi's post highlights Mock's concerns about industry arrogance and the potential for Apple to dominate the lower to mid-price watch market, drawing parallels to the quartz crisis. This discussion remains relevant as smartwatches continue to evolve and challenge traditional horology.

77 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

According to a (very informative and well written) report published today at bloomberg.com, Elmar Mock, co-inventor of the Swatch and one of the most important figure in the Swiss watch industry (and Prix-Gaia laureate), offered dire outlook on the Swiss watch industry amidst the imminent launch of the Apple Watch. The reason according to Mr Mock: arrogance!





According to the keynote presentation of Tim Cook on Monday, the Apple Watch will come in three version, covering three important price brackets (and thus market ranges):

- Apple Watch Sport (aluminium) starts at $349
- Apple Watch (stainless steel) just over $1,000
- Apple Watch Edition (18 ct. gold) begin at $10,000

While the latter being a special piece to be sold in a very limited quantities, the remaining volume models occupy a niche where over 90% of the Swiss watch production (in terms of volume) resp. 40 % of the value is sold.

And, as Mr Mock says, anything in this price bracket really is in danger. To put this in numbers: Apple is expected to sell 20 to 30 million watches in the first year. Switzerland's watch exports in 2014 were close to 30 million. In other words, already in the first year Apple will sell as many watches as entires Switzerland!

Mock further recalls the "quartz crisis" of the 1970s and 1980s, where the Swiss industry totally misjudged the impeding threat posed by cheap Japanese quartz watches, ultimately resulting in the loss of more than 60.000 jobs in the watch industry. 

"So far I see watchmakers in this country making the same mistakes as back then," Mock said. "We've seen a lot of arrogance in the Swiss watch industry in the past few years, calling the smartwatch a gadget and not taking it seriously."

Tough times ahead, but the Swiss have not yet lost the case if "the top managements of the companies will react accordingly", Mock adds.

Personally, I think he has a point. Not having had a personal experience with the Apple Watch I won't be further going into the utility of a smart wearable, its appeal to watch collectors or its long time value, However, I can safely say that the traditional watch industry, particularly in the lower to mid price range, got they wake-up call on Monday: If it is not for technology, than at least for case construction. Having seen what Apple can offer in terms of materials innovation, design and (supposedly) quality (the new aluminium and the high-tech gold), then I have to say: one gear (at least) up, please!

Cheers,
Magnus 
This message has been edited by Ornatus-Mundi on 2015-03-10 16:09:09 This message has been edited by Ornatus-Mundi on 2015-03-10 16:11:07

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
SA
Sandgroper
Mar 10, 2015
Thank you for this information Magnus.....

Very interesting, although I would agree with the fact that the Apple Watch is a gadget, what else would it be? However, gadget from Apple have a good track record for selling like hot cakes and I believe it to be much easier for a company like say, Swatch, to incorporate smartness in their line of watches than for Apple to start manufacturing mechanical watches. History has shown over and over that once on top, an individual, a company or a country for that matter, tends to become arrogant and

AR
Ares501 - Mr Green
Mar 11, 2015
We are not..

"supposed" to evolve but it wouldn't hurt ;) :) Cheers D

PP
pplater
Mar 11, 2015
(What would YOU know about evolution, Damjan???)... ;-) [nt]

AR
Ares501 - Mr Green
Mar 11, 2015
Pretty much...

nothing :)

SA
Sandgroper
Mar 11, 2015
Are we not supposed to?.....

I remember when I was about 11-12 years old our class went to visit a small zoo in Switzerland, the zoo keeper pointing toward the monkeys said that we all "descend" from monkeys, however, some descended faster.....in my naivety, since then, I have hold as truth that the slowest of us were actually evolving! Nah, just BS....dream stuff;) Thank you dear Damjan for enlightening me;) Cheers Francois

AR
Ares501 - Mr Green
Mar 12, 2015
Glad that not only in my country....

that completely wrong misconception that we descend from monkey(s) was told children :)

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 77 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →