Tourbillon location

Jan 09, 2010,18:26 PM
 

It is a personal preference at some point true enough. However I believe the logic of the hidden Tourbillon is that Patek does this intentional due to the possible exposure to the sun and artificial light that will dry out the oils and lubricants that are necessary for the time piece. For me again a personal opinion ( so please do not take offense it's not my intention) I prefer the more logical / scientific approach rather than the aesthetic one.

Hope this helps in gaining insight!

warm regards,

Revy

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Question PATEK and Tourbillon

 
 By: T2009 : January 9th, 2010-09:01
Question for Patek collectors..... As far as Patek Philippe watches are concerned, despite the fact that they are unique in the world of watches, and true pieces to admire, the philosophy of hiding the tourbillon behind the dial kept me always somewhat......  

No, I like a dial to be clean, however it seems that a lot of other

 
 By: whit : January 9th, 2010-09:48
manufacturers like portions of the movement to be exposed. Just my preference.

No

 
 By: Dje : January 9th, 2010-11:47
Hi, IMO there are enough tourbillons on dials around. I like plain dials,and prefer to see tourbillons on the back, like in the PPs, in the Reverso Tourbillon (the "simple" one), or in some GP models. The exception would be the Haldimman or the Omega cent... 

I have not.....

 
 By: MiniCooper : January 9th, 2010-12:57
seen this watch in metal.... Does it have a see through back? Cheers

Which one? nt

 
 By: Dje : January 10th, 2010-03:30
nt

5101.... nt

 
 By: MiniCooper : January 10th, 2010-06:50

Thank you.....

 
 By: MiniCooper : January 10th, 2010-12:27
If someone has a photo to post please do so... Thanks.... Cheers

The essence of wearing a Patek is not for others to admire you

 
 By: LarryFRCGP : January 9th, 2010-16:21
So it is absoultely in the spirit of Patek to keep the tourbillon at the back There is also a semi-official explanation from Thiery Stern that day I met with him at a Patek dinner in Hong Kong in 2006. That was before he inherit the CEO position. He did s... 

I've owned the 5101P

 
 By: tourbillon001 : January 9th, 2010-17:01
and it was very nice and stealthy. I love tourbillons and actually prefer to see them on the dial but for this model and most Patek models I think they should be left on the backside. I actually prefer my tourbillons to be in very modern watch IE Richard ... 

Hidden... just like in a Panerai?

 
 By: Talleyrand : January 11th, 2010-14:18
You can argue that tourbillons don't provide any specific advantage to wristwatches (I suppose that JLC would challenge this comment after winning the Neuchatel competition) besides an aesthetic pleasure. Therefore, why deprive the user of the pleasure of... 

Tourbillon location

 
 By: revy : January 9th, 2010-18:26
It is a personal preference at some point true enough. However I believe the logic of the hidden Tourbillon is that Patek does this intentional due to the possible exposure to the sun and artificial light that will dry out the oils and lubricants that are... 

I like my tourbillon hidden from view...

 
 By: patrick_y : January 9th, 2010-21:50
I think Patek does this the best among any brand out there. Period. A tourbillon complication is not necessary to be shown outside. I like the fact that Patek hides the tourbillon away from view and it gives the watch a truly low-key look. Truly beautiful... 

Patek & Tourbillon

 
 By: T2009 : January 9th, 2010-22:13
Thanks everyone for the personal view you shared... Of course, this discussion can go over and over, and the truth is that there is a cup of tea for every taste out there. Personally, I find other complications more useful, a simple chrono, Annual or Perp... 

My personal views...

 
 By: patrick_y : January 10th, 2010-13:14
I consider tourbillons to be a "Drivetrain" complication and a "Passive" complication. It's something that you don't see. Chornographs, perpetual calendars, minute repeaters, etc. I consider to be "Active" complications. Back to passive complications; per... 

I agree with Larry , 100% [nt]

 
 By: chronoman19 : January 10th, 2010-09:19
No message body