Maans
12
Yes, 1921 is 36,5 mm
For me the sizes 36 and 36,5 are just perfect. I’m very old fashioned with the watch sizes. My father had an Omega in 33 mm. As a matter of fact 1921 36,5 mm looks much bigger as it is cushion shaped. I love the movement in 1955. It is a pleasure to wind it. Very easy to wind and it shows clearly when full. 1921 is totally different in winding. It is quite stiff and it took some time to believe that it needs almost endless number of turns to get it fully wound 😉. However, I love both of them. Very vintage…
The 1921 is a more common stunner
This 1955 on the other hand has always been intriguing to me and rarely seen. Love the ultra thin. At 36mm unsure how it wears. I have never seen one. Guessing by looks the 1921 is 36.5?
Yes, 1921 is 36,5 mm
For me the sizes 36 and 36,5 are just perfect. I’m very old fashioned with the watch sizes. My father had an Omega in 33 mm. As a matter of fact 1921 36,5 mm looks much bigger as it is cushion shaped. I love the movement in 1955. It is a pleasure to wind ...
The smaller 1921 is a really nice size
On my 18cm wrist, the large version did not fit well. Stunning duo you have; congratulations! GEO
