Controversy on outsourced movements: Zenith explains its move in a Financial Times article

Jun 11, 2014,10:45 AM
 

Dear All:

thanks to my fellow moderator Andrew Daley I can now provide you with an article recently published in the renowned UK newspaper Financial Times. Therein Zenith's global marketing director Juliette North very openly explains the reasoning behind this decision. 

The text sheds some fascinating insights into the circumstances watch brands have to consider in their strategic plans, and also highlights the role collectors - here even called purists - have.

I am reproducing the text here with a view on initiating a lively and mature debate. Please feel free to share your thoughts: Is this an acceptable move for you? Does it hurt the brand'a appreciation? Do you think this could be beneficial since it promises additional revenues without daring excessively on development resources? Do you think other will follow? Etc. - the floor is yours!

Best,
Magnus

"Zenith sacrifices self-reliance to underpin growth
By Robin Swithinbank

In light of the watch industrys continued obsession with in-house production strategies, Zeniths announcement at Baselworld this year that it was forsaking its pure manufacture status by outsourcing movements came as a surprise.

Over the past decade, established watch companies have sunk vast sums into building a self-reliant future, making Zeniths announcement that it is doing the opposite appear incongruous. But the company says the decision is a pivotal part of an ambitious expansion plan that will take it into the mainstream and transform its fortunes, turning it from an insider brand into one of the industry's bigger names.

There are two reasons behind the decision, says Juliette North, Zenith's global marketing director, who spoke to the Financial Times because the companys chief executive, Jean-Frédérique Dufour, is leaving to become chief executive of Rolex. Its important to us to develop the El Primero calibre, which is the backbone of the company. And we want to recruit new customers.

Watches featuring the new three-hand movement called Zenith Calibre 3000 and produced and assembled by Swiss movement manufacturing company Sellita will cost significantly less than those powered by Zeniths in-house equivalent, the Elite calibre. This, the brand believes, will attract new customers and contribute to a spike in sales currently stifled by a lack of capacity.

In the five years since Mr Dufour took the helm at Zenith and following a SFr20m ($22m) investment in the companys manufacturing base, the brands annual output has increased from 8,000 to 50,000 movements a year. About 10,000 of those movements are passed to fellow LVMH Group brands Bulgari, TAG Heuer, Chaumet and Dior. To increase significantly the number of watches it can bring to market, Zenith says it now needs to look elsewhere.

In addition to appealing to a more price-conscious consumer, Zenith believes watches fuelled by Calibre 3000 will draw in consumers less concerned by traditional watchmaking. It means we can talk to customers who may be less aware of the manufacture aspect and care less about it, says Ms North.



(Zenith Pilot Extra Special with the Cal. 3000 neé Sellita SW300)

Zenith says it is making no attempt to hide the fact the new movement is a rebranded version of Sellitas SW300 calibre, although models carrying Calibre 3000 have solid rather than transparent case backs (another cost-saving measure), and there is no disclaimer on the brands website. Not that Zenith is obliged to declare the genesis of its movements the practice of renaming outsourced calibres is common in the watch industry.

Under the deal, Sellita will supply Zenith with fully assembled movements, which are encased and passed through quality control in Zeniths workshops. Zenith declined to comment on the quantity of movements it has committed to buy, or on how much it is investing in the strategy. Prices for watches with the Calibre 3000 will start from £2,200, some £1,600 less than entry-level Elite models. 

As Zenith looks to pour resources into developing the El Primero, one casualty of the move may be the Elite movement itself. Mr Dufour has been quoted announcing the demise of the calibre introduced in 1994, one of the first in the industry to be designed using CAD technology, but sources have been unable to confirm whether the strategy would be retained by Mr Dufours successor, Aldo Magada, former chief executive of Gucci Group Watches.

Zeniths volte-face may have an impact on its brand positioning and perceptions. Currently, Zenith markets itself as a traditional movement manufacturer that has made more than 600 calibres during its history and been awarded 2,333 prizes for chronometry. At the moment, Zenith is the industrys best-kept secret, says Ms North. Its time for it to grow into a big business.

Her point is not lost on industry observers. Timothy Barber, editor of specialist watch magazine QP, says: Insiders value Zenith as a historic manufacture brand famous for precision and particularly for its El Primero movement. But Zenith has struggled to get that message out more broadly, because it doesnt have the impact of say Omega or TAG Heuer. Its a respectable Swiss brand that is a classy alternative to the big boys, but relatively anonymous. 

So, while watch-educated people may mourn its true manufacture status, they arguably aren't its future core audience. To grow, Zenith needs to reach an audience for whom manufacture status is less of a concern. Much of that growth is expected to come in emerging markets, where accessibly priced, time-only luxury watches are considerably more popular than chronographs. Zeniths Swiss heritage has already won fans in economies where the watch market has experienced rapid recent growth, particularly China, around which the brand has based its pricing strategy.

Mr Dufour saw that Chinas buying power wouldnt last for ever, so he kept prices at a reasonable level, says Ms North. By contrast, some of our competitors are suffering because they put all their eggs in one basket. Going in-house and positioning your brand at double the price point doesn't necessarily succeed. Some have done it and its worked; for other brands, it hasn't, and they're having to bring their prices down.

Zeniths new direction suggests the influence of Jean-Claude Biver, LVMH Groups head of watches and former Hublot chairman, is already kicking in. LVMH hopes Mr Biver can propel Zenith to global recognition as he did Hublot while serving as its chief executive during the 2000s.

Ms North says: Mr Dufour has done a huge job with repositioning the collection, telling people that Zenith exists and taking it back to its true values. Mr Biver is going to add to this, allowing the company to expand. Zeniths status as a traditional or purist brand seems likely to change, but it is confident that in doing so it will become a more successful business. It also believes it wont be the last to adopt the strategy.

Unless brands can produce in-house movements at an affordable price that makes commercial sense to the end consumer, they will have to [follow us], says Ms North." 



More posts: CalibresDufourEl PrimeroElitePilot

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

The last sentence is very telling...

 
 By: brandon1 : June 11th, 2014-11:43
Very interesting read; thank you for sharing! I think the last line is particularly interesting; the suggestion that we may begin to see more brands stepping 'down' to sourced movements, in order to evolve to face the new economic realities of the industr... 

The 'in-house' trend really is late 20s/early 21st century marketing...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-12:31
and like you I can understand why brands like to use it to sell their watches and distinguish themselves - its so easy to 'understand'... However, a watch is much more than a movement, and the other qualities (and those of the brand) are much more difficu... 

This is very sad...

 
 By: DonCorson : June 11th, 2014-13:48
As I see it, there are at present only two high end industrial watch companies (Swatch Group and Rolex). The rest are more or less boutique marketing houses, especially LMVH. Why Zenith can't sell more than 30'000 watches a year is a mystery. Do they get ... 

Don, I understand where you are coming from but...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-12:34
I think you put a but much emphasis on the movement (as I said fully understandable as an accomplished watchmaker ,-)). Just because Zenith resorts to outsourced movements does not meant that the watches are on the same level as a Tissot (which besides do... 

I understand, but I don't understand...

 
 By: aaronm : June 11th, 2014-13:57
I entirely understand why, if they want to expand the brand, they need to have a lower entry-price and to achieve that, they must forgo the in-house movements. What I am less clear on is the need to expand the brand. They're not a small company, or even p... 

Where else are RD movements used?

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-12:54
I would risk the statement that RD is not exactly a success story either. So, if according to Ms North 'purists' (read: collectors) are not the main target audience I guess it would be difficult to market the advantages of a Zenith movement in a Dior, TAG... 

Cartier

 
 By: aaronm : June 12th, 2014-16:32
I don't remember if any particular RD movements are used completely unchanged, but they are the basis for several of the recent complications, i.e. the Ballon Bleu Flying Tourbillon A

The Circle of Time

 
 By: MTF : June 11th, 2014-18:35
Dear forumners, What's the problem? This is the natural cycle of time in the watch industry. By the fact that some people are complaining shows how "young" today's consumer or collector of mechanical watches are. Even our more senior members remember buyi...  

very well put!

 
 By: Asad A Awan : June 12th, 2014-02:59
Sir, your response reflects a very deep understanding of human psychology and the retail market..I am a Pakistani and have lived in six different countries and currently living in South Korea. your point about new lifestyles and artificial gods' creation ... 

The watch industry and its customers - what came first, and what follows?

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-13:13
Dear Melvyn thanks for your very refreshing perspective. Yes, I agree with you on the cycles. Demand comes and goes, tastes and preferences change, and the industry has to cope with it. I see an industry confronted with immensely expensive overheads due t... 

Sad indeed

 
 By: Spellbound : June 11th, 2014-18:41
Zenith has decided to turn its back on it's loyalists. It would be fine if these moves would be accompanied by moves to make the best possible watch and to innovate. I have no issue with outsourcing so long as this is reflected in the price and they do no... 

But I read the statement such that they indeed want to focus on innovating...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-13:02
at the level of the El Primero (with all its iterations and derivatives, from Minute Repeater to a basic three-handed watch) and forego the level of Elite at an in-house status. While the Elite is an outstanding movement, its not exactly a star in the app... 

Shaky start

 
 By: f_klo : June 11th, 2014-20:46
I can't say that Zenith's decision to start using outsourced movements is the wrong direction for the brand as it is still too early to tell. But I must say that the "Pilot Type 20 Extra Special" a bad start. Here's a few classic examples why. 1. Customer... 

I fully agree with you, and the only explanation I have...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-13:04
is that the Sellita-thingy is an afterthought where they had to use the just revived Pilot collection exactly because this one is actually attracting new (and younger) customers. Best, Magnus

At the end of the day, it is about running a business

 
 By: rnaden : June 11th, 2014-22:20
While I'm not thrilled about the news, I don't really have an issue with this. IMO, they're taking the same path many other watch manufacturers/companies are on in broadening the appeal to the market, from the purists to the man on the street who's lookin... 

Right on !

 
 By: DonCorson : June 11th, 2014-23:38
+1 "What I will have an issue with is not so much the movements, but the marketing that goes about endorsing just about every private club and sports star out there and passing those costs down to the consumer, which will then negate any potential price e... 

Thanks for your opinion, indeed, it could be beneficial even for us purists...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-13:06
if - and this is a big IF - they play it well. I am inclined to give the incoming CEO a carte blanche on this. Magnus

Zenith has done it, others have/will do it, and its a reasonable decision!

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 12th, 2014-13:48
Dear all: I took the liberty of taking a few days to ponder about this decision. Initially, I was taken aback by it, but the more I think about it and the more I read the contributions here (THANKS SO MUCH!) the more I am confident that (partially) resort... 

Extremely well put

 
 By: Spellbound : June 12th, 2014-17:14
Very well said Magnus. Like I mentioned, I have no issue with the move to partially outsource. I was not impressed with the way they quietly introduced it in a watch labelled Extra Special. And I have yet to see how the movement is finished. I am also a l... 

But this is Zenith. I guess I can be a romantic when it comes...

 
 By: Echi : June 13th, 2014-09:19
to these things. Also the reason why I don't make a ton of money. But then again, I never really needed to ;) Thanks for sharing this article.

I'm Not Convinced

 
 By: Tim_M : June 20th, 2014-09:45
All this proves is that LVMH doesn't understand the brand. This move will alienate the current clientele without drawing a new set of loyalists. Already, it's difficult to see how a high-volume Zenith is anything but duplicative of TAG Heuer, a brand that... 

You bring up a very valid point comparing to the other watch conglomerates...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : June 25th, 2014-05:20
Swatch certainly did a wise thing in that the split their customers into various levels served by different brands , not trying a one-brand-fits-it-all approach. I am not saying that Zenith is trying to do that, its to early and in addition - next week we... 

Obviously

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : July 2nd, 2014-14:30
they read PPro's Zenith forum :) I think that apart from the fact that all manufacturers use different online resources to feel the pulse of customers our CEO MTF already said it in this thread "Zenith did NOT announce they were abandoning in-house moveme... 

a 'but' that causes a second 'but'...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : July 3rd, 2014-00:22
'but 1': In the FT article it was stated that previous CEO Mr Dufour announced the demise of the Elite movement. Which immediately raises... 'but 2': the announcement of the new ladies' timepieces with the Elite movement came on 2 July - the 2nd day in o... 

Without any false pretention

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : July 3rd, 2014-02:11
that I'm God given or knowledgeable or of any merit but I feel and see that life is full of ifs and buts (pun not intended) so world of horology is not exception Life is one big compromise ...some learn it sooner some later some too late...some hard way o... 

Outsourced movements

 
 By: riverside / Henry : July 3rd, 2014-18:43
If Rolex could use El Primero movements, and Patek Philippe could use Lemania movements, it is understandable that Zenith uses Sellita movements.

My 2 cents

 
 By: dreamwalker168 : September 12th, 2014-16:46
The reality is that Zenith is only known to the cognoscenti. Ask your non WIS friends, family, and colleagues to name an example of a "good" watch and inevitably Rolex will be mentioned. If you had a couple of grand to blow on your first good watch the ch... 

I meant stratos chronograph

 
 By: dreamwalker168 : September 12th, 2014-16:51
Sorry for the misspelling

But have you read...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : September 13th, 2014-06:17
that the Sellita movement are - rumor has it - already history? More here: Cheers, Magnus