Jurry
6103
Its gorgeous but
But without the diamonds would be better.
To answer your questions;
NO I wouldn’t wear it not with the diamonds
YES would certainly give it to my wife to wear
Great post thanks
As requested: a thin Grand Seiko - 38.5 x 10
A dress watch evoking the bright and fresh crystaline snow of winter in Shinshu, combined with the smooth sweeping movement of the seconds hand unique to Spring Drive. This watch captures the tranquil and seamless passage of time. Rose gold case with tran...
Its gorgeous but
But without the diamonds would be better. To answer your questions; NO I wouldn’t wear it not with the diamonds YES would certainly give it to my wife to wear Great post thanks
Sorry I am biased
but I prefer the SBGY007 in steel and which is tons better value! ...
Yes, I would wear it, no, I would not share it
AND I would be hard pressed to pay $38,000+ for a Seiko.
No,would not wear this...
....the jewels are just too ostentatious,to begin with. As a dress watch, i would not like a second hand,which would defeat the purpose of enjoying the smooth sweep of the second hand which is one of the main selling points of the spring drive. I do like ...
Finanlly, the diamond tuxedo/dress watch is back!!
So yes, i would totes wear it to answer your question, i would never allow my wife to wear it, i would just buy her a Faberge Swan watch or a bovet Recital 23 (assuming I can afford both lol)
I would absolutely wear this
Although 10.2mm still doesn't seem "thin" to me for a dress watch. I'd prefer no diamonds too.
