mynewemailaccount
22
Lots of good information in your post.
Hello Jay,
Thanks very much for sharing.
Regards,
Bob S
Seiko 6105-8000 : No, not the 6105 reissue, the other one, the first one!
Disclaimer: The accuracy of the below is not guaranteed, there are numerous more knowledgable and reliable sources than I on Seiko Divers and the 6105 references. If you notice any glaring errors please don’t be shy in highlighting, similarly please chime...
Lots of good information in your post.
Hello Jay, Thanks very much for sharing. Regards, Bob S
Hello Jay
Thanks for the dedicated review of one of my favorite seiko divers. I think the smaller toneau case makes it more wearable, and it’s a case shape many brands still use. I also found my 6105-8110 by chance but has become a staple in my collection. Best. Re...
Thanks René. Smaller case is definitely for me, I've tried the -8110 a few times and while I probably should have picked up the watch at the time it wasn't really wearable for me.
This one, the -8000 was the right choice and it does get a decent amount of wrist time.
Seiko 6105-8009 proof and resist
Great review thank you. I am a big Seiko fan of the period to include the 62mas. So much history. Below the 6105-8000 with proof on the dial and water proof on the caseback. Note specifically water space proof not waterproof Below is the Seiko 6105-8009 w...
Are the three on the right identical? . . .
. . . that's dedication! I've multiple issues of the same reference when it comes to Omega chronometers, but all have different dials and case materials. Long an admirer of Seiko divers; would like to have an SKX013 if it could be had with a movement made...
Yes, but different date production
I had one 6105-8110, but after that I had the oportunity of buying 2 more of my birth year and month, and I couldn’t resist...
