Bill
32130
Your answer was much more complete worth the extra 20 lines
Hi Cisco
The other key word for Rolex is Passion. Over used but under rated.
Thanks
Bill
Come on, Tyler... :)
By: amanico : May 2nd, 2011-07:50
Here is the 116 520 ( Credit picture: P.W ) Here is the 16520 ( Zenith ) : The finish of the case is not the same, the dial is different ( not the same indexes, thinner and longer on the Zenith, the surroundings of the subdials are different, too ) not th...
DAYTONA
By: alih711 : July 7th, 2011-10:56
Dear sir Would you tell me the price of daytona second one and what is the condition is it with box and how much is it ? i am in dubai how can we echange the monay and watch ? what is the garantee of orginality ? 00971504575383 reg/Ali
good picture...but
By: Baron - Mr Red : May 2nd, 2011-12:35
it could be that Nico meant "the first" that worked properly ? The Milgauss was certainly the first that was specifically designed for use against substantial magnetic force, no? Sometimes greatness is achieved on the shoulders of giants.
Complicated matter, indeed.
By: amanico : May 4th, 2011-14:09
Which needs a lot of research, some strong convictions, perpetual efforts and hunts to get the best of the Vintage Rolex, without getting the worse. I agree that there are easier matters, but not more passionate, intriguing, and enthusiasming. Best, Nicol...
Rolex - Waterproof watch??
By: BDLJ : May 5th, 2011-16:46
So the patent for a screw down case and screw down crown was Rolex? No. I don't disagree that Rolex was ahead of the game in the robust/purposeful watch field. But to say they invented it....well. But that's the case when there's any claim for a 'first'. ...
Depollier!
By: BDLJ : May 5th, 2011-23:35
February 22, 1916. So predates the 1921 (?) Rolex patent. I have an image on a memory stick somewhere...can't find it. In the meantime, try Google patent search for "Depollier patent". The actual number is 1172601. Also, email sent! This message has been ...
Soul and aesthetics
By: cisco : May 2nd, 2011-08:58
My 2 cents: I think that the basics of aesthetic has been lost in lot of novelties and also the balance. When watches were a real everyday tool Rolex ruled it with its technological advance but there was also this special aesthetics of the oyster which ma...
Great discussion
By: Bill : May 2nd, 2011-14:52
All I can add is yes the Vintage Rolex has soul. They have survived the ravages of time yet the appear as modern today as any of the newer Rolex models But the retain an aesthetic balance that some of the newer model are challenging and in some cases not ...
The line is so thin that ...
By: Bill : May 2nd, 2011-23:51
the addition of the word compulsive shifts the balance a little. I think we blur the line everyday. Creating some boundaries helps but then hit the term addiction or even affliction. As long as you don't steal or harm anyone in your pursuit it remains a p...
Agreed on points 1 and 3...
By: amanico : May 3rd, 2011-08:55
Not sure about point 2, as each day brings its new lot of new Rolex fans and clients, who are very pleased with the Modern offers. We know both Modern abnd Vintage Rolex, and we clearly have our preferrences, but what about the new clients. As for point 4...
No ... and No.
By: amanico : May 4th, 2011-02:25
The YM is a Sub, so we may consider that the Vintage exists. I don't own the Vintage Milgauss, but yes, it is in my wish list. Best, Nicolas. This message has been edited by amanico on 2011-05-04 02:41:18
Awesome thread...
By: hans_jorgen_1968 : May 4th, 2011-11:40
...great with many good and insightful comments.. I have to admit, I own, and have owned more modern than vintage Rolex watches.. however, it was due to this forum, and you my dear friends, that I caught the vintage bug a few years. I only want to say THA...
That's a valid point too.
By: TdotBean : May 5th, 2011-07:58
You articulate much better than me. It is the time spend knowing Rolex not how many years went by. Experience not age. Thanks for making it clear. I am not confronting modern vs. vintage. I am stating that it is unfair to compare as the matter of fact. If...
Great post, BAron...
By: Echi : May 5th, 2011-21:24
I think the tough challenge here is the fact that back in the day, the world needed tool watches. Today, the toolwatch has become an accessory such that "innovation" as that word goes becomes a bit superficial when you think about it. So what then is grou...
a new thought.....
By: Baron - Mr Red : May 6th, 2011-02:08
It is a fair and valid point that many people want and like having modern tribute Rolex....watches that have teh same DNA as teh vintage but the advantage of being affordable and having modern technology. I have done it frequently nyself, and do see the l...
Great Post
By: thehorologist : May 6th, 2011-09:36
I hear you. I defiantly do. However, I feel as if Rolex has taken the "not broken dont fix it" approach. Why would they change their classic business model that all Rolex loves are obsessed with? All they need is to introduce a new line that everyone hate...
vintage Rolex
By: vintageguy : May 7th, 2011-09:55
vintage Rolex movements are just as tough &accurate as the modern stuff,I.e.,a 1927 watch swam the English channel, &a 1953 watch climbed Everest,so to speak. IMHO, vintage Rolex have more style &panache, the smaller case size being more subtle. Rolex has...
I agree with Nicolas,
By: E.S : May 8th, 2011-03:18
It is very difficult to perfected a watch that already perfect. They do not want to go to far from their direction,which also increasing the value of vintage. If they reproduce the Vintage, people also leave this territory and Vintage will diminish. Very ...