WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Rolex

Still : there are some modern Rolex that are on theire way to get more and more collectible

 

Think of the Sub anniversary with the LV, that you can distinguish to a LV fat four also: both are modern and maybe also in high quantities produced (albeit Rolex does not communicate numbers) but it "made it" to the collectors sphere and if you judge it by aftermarket asking prices for foiled models the Sub LV "did it very well".
Other vintage models are certainly also produced in high quantities but there the aging and condition makes them rare.
Regarding patina generally my thoughts are that there are still parts left of a modern Rolex that will develop a patina, such as the Chromalight and after all not all patina is regarded beautiful or pleasing.
There it depends again on the overall look of the aging.
Additionally watches create an unexpected form of patina at times.
The cyclops, the cyclops ... smile Maybe Rolex left the cyclops out as a distinguishing factor only towards the Subs.
Today, where buyers also want to show to the non-connoisseurs that they are wearing a Rolex, they put I back on.
But again as a distinguishing factor but towards the existing SD models and hence in traditional Rolex fashion.
But after all my thoughts are that this anniversary with its case design looks more like a Rolex than any other modern Rolex sports model currently on the market.
Certainly you can say the same about the predecessor of this anniversary model but it lacked the "collectability factor" of fewer numbers and the ingredient of a special edition.
Best
Moritz

  login to reply