Sort of ....

Oct 07, 2020,21:39 PM
 

To me, the biggest difference is the visual one due to the raised middle section of the end link. With regard to tangible changes, I think there is a slight difference when you hold the watch as the solid end link is incrementally more secure against the case compared to its stamped counterpart (and I’m just talking about feel rather than actual security, which is of course the same because the spring bars are unchanged). Similarly, there is also a little less hollow rattle from the stamped end link against the case (though you’ll inherently get some rattle from the bracelet itself compared the to the current style bracelet that was introduced in the 116520). Aside from that subtlety, they wear the same. But then again, Rolex collecting is all about small differences in what is otherwise the world’s most recognizable luxury watch, right?

I personally prefer the solid link, but I don’t think it’s worth a big premium. I’d rather have a porcelain dial.

Thanks,
Brian


More posts: 116520Daytona

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Questions about Daytona 16520 A series

 
 By: CL : October 7th, 2020-10:21
Hi Guys... I'm thinking of getting a Daytona 16520 and I'm wondering what's the appeal of an A series 16520 or does it matter? I was searching for one made in 1999 and it ends up to be A series which the dealer said that it is rare. I know very little abo...  

Another piece...

 
 By: CL : October 7th, 2020-10:28
How about the condition of this one? ...  

Wow... That's AWESOME!

 
 By: CL : October 7th, 2020-20:34
Thank you for this link

👍🙂 [nt]

 
 By: BigAppleBill : October 8th, 2020-05:23

I believe 'P' series (2000) are the latest produced

 
 By: PoyFR : October 7th, 2020-11:34
Based on the photo, this looks clean, probably unpolished. The second one you posted (based on the photos) seems to me badly polished, looks like it lost all its angles Good you are aiming for this Daytona ;-)

Thanks...

 
 By: CL : October 7th, 2020-20:28
The first one does look a lot cleaner and sharper.

Both have been polished.

 
 By: Signo : October 7th, 2020-13:04
The give-away is the "Units Per Hour," which show clear loss of paint from polishing. A-serial were produced for just over a year, around 1999. The hour and minute hands are in Luminova instead of Tritium.

Both have been polished and it is true.

 
 By: CL : October 7th, 2020-20:30
But I think the "Units Per Hour" is more of the light reflection than a clear loss of paint from polishing.

That's good to know.

 
 By: CL : October 7th, 2020-20:31
The question is does the earlier one without SEL feel different visually or wear different?

Sort of ....

 
 By: bchankai : October 7th, 2020-21:39
To me, the biggest difference is the visual one due to the raised middle section of the end link. With regard to tangible changes, I think there is a slight difference when you hold the watch as the solid end link is incrementally more secure against the ... 

As in most cases. Go for either the first or last of the series.

 
 By: Miles_151 : October 7th, 2020-23:22
So R7 serial or P. Although an A series has been Considered to be the end of the 16520. They are great watches and to be honest any 16520 is a gem to be treasured. M.

Aahhhhh maybe you were one of the collectors

 
 By: Miles_151 : October 8th, 2020-01:05
Who thought I was a lunatic 25 years ago when I was telling everyone in the watch community to buy as many 16520’s as they can. Yes my friend not one of your best decisions but we all have lots of those. You have another stunning example though to make yo... 

I know, I know... :( [nt]

 
 By: amanico : October 8th, 2020-03:39