6542 gmt

Aug 07, 2021,16:26 PM
 

OK, I didn't know the term 'newbie' was bad.
I have been interested in Rolex for a long time. Ive never used the forums. I have read, researched and learned what I can about the watches I am interested.
I clarified the term several time. I am not new to watches, or even Rolex. I am new to the serious dissections and tiny details of radium Rolex.
The first Rolex I ever bought was a 1967 5512 sub. I obsessed over matte dial 5513's and this came up from a trusted shop and I decided to research that.
I research based on specific targets, I have never had an opportunity or reason to dive into any watch before 1967. I have read articles and mentions of GMT's and 6542's. I know of them and some details, but I cannot distinguish a mk 1 dial from a mk 2 dial without lots of comparison and even then I am not familiar.
Was I rude to anyone until the final post? I dont think so, but maybe someone took something the wrong way? I just tried to be forthcoming and post new information when I received it.
I never told someone they were wrong, I never even made a concrete decision on what I believe I am looking at.
The fact that I continued to ask questions and I even posted this watch to a few different forums seemed to really make some people angry. I really did appreciate the information and I took it all to heart.
But because I didnt immediately take someones word on this and I continued to ask questions, people assumed I was pushy or defensive when I really tried to stay impartial until more information was available.
Please go back, re-read what I said. Please show me how I was rude before my last post. I thanked everyone, I acknowledged the posts I could... I actually learned a lot. But because I felt the need to push deeper, some people got offended. And when people are DM'ing me, telling me I am stupid and that I need to shut up and stop asking questions and stop posting, I will not tolerate that.
Look at how those members responded to ME. I asked another question and I get responses like "why are you even considering this, the experts spoke, stop asking questions." That is so enraging that I would rather get banned than sit there and be told to just take the word of someone I, personally, do not know.
You can believe what you want. I have not spent a single penny on this and, as much as you can't believe it, I just wanted to learn as much as I could. I dont need time to digest someone on a forum telling me they think its fake. I want consensus. I want multiple opinions. Why? Because I have a responsibility to give accurate information about this watch to the people that trust me.
If I posted one thread on one forum and took the first 3 responses as gospel, am I doing my due diligence? If I tell these people the watch is worthless, but it turns out the movement is real and the throw out thousands of dollars, are you going to reimburse them?
I understand the skepticism, but you need to understand that I am a real person. I am a watch lover. I am passionate about these watches. I have to learn somewhere. Not everything goes exactly the way you think it should...
Ill say it again, if you actively discourage people from seeking education and information, you are not doing them a favor. Telling me some folks are reputable and sharing information you have is constructive. Telling people to stop questioning "authority" and just fall in line is a dangerous way of thinking and it discourages growth, learning and potential discovery of new things.
Someone said I am looking for "something for nothing." My entire reason for talking to the person with this watch was to help ensure they dont get ripped off, in the off chance it was real. I pride myself in paying a fair price for family treasures and it has earned me a reputation that I care about. I know a guy who paid $500 for a big red daytona and bragged about ripping the old lady off. That type of stuff disgusts me so any time I can help prevent that, I do, free of charge, because I enjoy it.
I didnt show up to a party and start insulting people. I came to a forum, humbly asking for information and what I wanted to further my knowledge, I was told that I am doing something wrong. Only after I was told that I shouldn't ask more questions and I shouldn't seek other sources, I voice my opinion on that way of thinking and left. If that is how knowledge is gained and shared at that forum, I don't want a part of it.
This has nothing to do with the consensus that the watch is sketchy, it has everything to do with the arrogance the the active dissuasion of learning.


More posts: 551255136542DaytonaGMT MasterSubmariner

Locked login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Need advice on a 6542 being offered to me

 
 By: 5512sub : August 6th, 2021-15:46
Hello! I am being offered a (potential) 6542 and I am getting mixed opinions from some pretty serious collectors. Can I get any input on to the originality of this watch? The Rolex Forum says its a fake, but some respected collectors & dealers said it was...  

The scenario is all I would need to have no interest.

 
 By: oyster case : August 6th, 2021-17:41
I read the thread from the other forum. Why would you be interested in this particular piece? Is the seller going to give you an insane bargain price? If so, why? There is zero reason to entertain this particular piece but perhaps you can use the experien... 

yes

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-02:24
yes, i can name my price if i want. they asked me to tell them what its worth. i have a responsibility to get them accurate information

If there is any doubt there is no doubt.

 
 By: Miles_151 : August 7th, 2021-08:34
If the price is right and you don’t mind having a watch which is not correct then go for it. It wouldn’t do for me and I have never kept a watch with any doubts in over 35 years of collecting but if you can live with something that is not 100% or even 70%... 

Stay Away From This Watch!

 
 By: baufoam : August 6th, 2021-19:28
You are talking about a lot of money. If you have any doubt about what you are buying, run away! It will never be worth the aggravation and anxiety.

Not to be rude...

 
 By: gregcarraram3 : August 6th, 2021-21:33
But the answer is the same as you got on the other forums, including TRF. Don’t do it. There are several red flags, with the bezel insert, dial, etc, and given that you are joining these forums and posting this-people will be suspect. I mean no ill will, ... 

Not to be rude

 
 By: 5512sub : August 6th, 2021-22:23
Someone on the other thread specifically suggested I post it here. I will write up everything I can, post it and then not worry. I have been presented with very strong evidence that this watch has been documented since at least the 1980's had the bezel, h... 

im fried

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-02:18
I know it sounds crazy. I feel crazy. I just got banned from RolexForums because instead of just accepting the first opinion that was posted there, I kept asking questions and posting new pictures and information I received as I received it. They told me ... 

Not a rolex expert

 
 By: mhz vph : August 6th, 2021-22:19
But the paint on the seconds hand looks very, very out of place. But that aside, I will echo the sentiments of the other commenters. If you have any doubts at all, that's enough to walk away on a purchase of this magnitude.

seconds hand

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-02:50
You are not the first to point out the weirdness of the hands. They are definitely highly suspect to me. The whole watch is suspect, that is why I have been asking around. I wont be buying this, but I might be asking more questions about 6542's!

Have the timepiece authenticated by a Rolex authorized service center. My suggestion. 👍

 
 By: geross : August 7th, 2021-00:16
Maybe some parts are not original. So best to have it authenticated. Even if you spend. Geross.

hmm....

 
 By: aston.db4 : August 7th, 2021-02:37
Vintage Rolex is a huge minefield. I was shocked at how one of the most reputable vintage Rolex dealers in my area did to sell a "completed" watch. It left a huge distaste in my mouth when I found out the local RSC was in cahoot. OP, by the way, Philip St... 

ok

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-02:52
Yeah, things are crazy and get worse every day. Thank you for your input. Over at the Rolex Forum, he literally authored THE THREAD about identifying vintage Rolex originality and it seemed like they respected RolexPassionReport..... Who the heck can I tr... 

Trust Information Authentic Documented

 
 By: cazalea : August 7th, 2021-05:25
Words like these are not very useful when talking about 50-year-old watches, particularly ones that cost a fortune and are frequently faked. These questions are typically asked by newcomers to forums. They are annoying. They waste everyone’s time. They le... 

+1 👍, words of wisdom.

 
 By: geross : August 7th, 2021-07:21

riiiight

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-17:07
You are making the assumption that I am nefarious. That I am wanting something for nothing. I am fully willing and able to pay fair market value for this watch. The problem is, I have no idea what fair market value is. I came to the forum because I did no... 

?

 
 By: PalmSprings : August 7th, 2021-14:14
What do you mean with a completed watch? A put together one with the best case from A, best dial from B, best hands from C, best bracelet from D, ...?

To OP: I have been following your quest for information over at TRF, VRF and now here.

 
 By: ChetBaker : August 7th, 2021-07:33
You seem obsessed with this watch and/or the pursuit of this particular opportunity. My sincere advice: take a step back, close your laptop, go for a walk and get a good night’s sleep. You will wake up in the morning knowing that you saved yourself a lot ... 

Maybe a bit to simple of an answer

 
 By: marcobermann : August 7th, 2021-08:34
But one that has been proven in the test of time "If in doubt don't" Marc

Thank you

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-17:16
I came trying to learn. I apologize that my method of collecting information is to ask a lot of questions and engage in discussion. When I have time, I dive deep. I started to become obsessed with trying to appease the egos on the forum. I spoke so very c... 

I read, re-read, and read yet again your posting on TRF.

 
 By: gregcarraram3 : August 7th, 2021-11:53
You were rude, you spiraled into an expletive ridden rant, because you know full well, as you claim to be a so-called “newbie” an annoying term in and of itself, yet your nickname is 5512sub. Please. As a “newbie” you have the insight, or perhaps it is a ... 

1

 
 By: PalmSprings : August 7th, 2021-14:16
I kinda wish he would have actually bought the watch if 100k is nothing to him. Just do it, for the amusement.

6542 gmt

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-16:26
OK, I didn't know the term 'newbie' was bad. I have been interested in Rolex for a long time. Ive never used the forums. I have read, researched and learned what I can about the watches I am interested. I clarified the term several time. I am not new to w... 

Follow up

 
 By: 5512sub : August 7th, 2021-16:48
I stand by everything I said minus the profanity. Many of the users were cool. When they started showing up in threads on other forums telling me that posting requests to other forums makes me suspect and when I was told I was ignoring the red flags, or w... 

I didn’t put any words in your mouth

 
 By: gregcarraram3 : August 7th, 2021-17:13
And was not involved in the TRF thread. I read it objectively. If you didn’t like the reaction you could’ve dropped off the thread or the forum. Instead you chose to behave the way you did. Whatever, good luck with your 100k watch.