Flanker
217
I think
that the number fonts on the bezel are too wide, also the indices on the dial are too big, when you combine these two effects it creates a crowded and cramped dial. This the first feeling I have when I also physically see the new GMTs. If you check the good old GMT, then you can see these parts are handled delicately.
Also bezel colors of new one lack contrast between red and blue somehow.The old GMT or new Tudor BB GMT colors are better IMHO.
Akgün
great live side by side pic of 1986 1st gen vs new 2018 release. Judge bezel colors/font style/size and rest of dial/hand/indices/case proportions for yourself. I know what I think.
Screen shot from watchadvisor youtube video. ...
First gen always has a character, a charm to love about...
Having said that, the new ones are tomorrow’s classics... I will go with the new....They’re well made, better evolutionary benefits. Best, Mahesh.,
It is very hard to improve on perfect.
I must say the proportions of the classic Rolex are very well balanced. The modern on its own is a great watch but hard to compare. It like old Hollywood starlets vs the new each has its time and appeals to exh generation. I am still hung up in the vintag...
Nothing beats a good old 1675 gilt,
Perhaps my favourite all time Rolex; having said that if you compare a 16750 or later with the new 2018 version... I think I prefer the new one.... Oh, did I just said that??
I think
that the number fonts on the bezel are too wide, also the indices on the dial are too big, when you combine these two effects it creates a crowded and cramped dial. This the first feeling I have when I also physically see the new GMTs. If you check the go...
I'll take the modern.
The only way I can find to describe the new Pepsi is that it seems like 'the louder and slightly more obnoxious younger brother'. I would agree that the dial and bezel are busy and that's why the new jubilee bracelet works so well with it, an oyster is to...
