Jay thank you for chiming in ..

Oct 22, 2020,01:48 AM
 

I own RM055, RM030, RM52-01, RM63-01, RM016, RM11 and RM33 .. in all honesty, I love the RM005 as a daily watch. I am currently seeking for a RM002 or RM003 ie similar size as the 005.


I love smaller watches lately.. they are so easy to wear and no hassle.. 

 Many ppl don’t realise the RM005 is only 11.5mm thickness which is thinner than Rolex DD40 and DJ41 ..  that’s a very low profile for a sport watch especially for a RM. 

Personally I use my watch a lot in the kitchen and in the pool/beach , I need all watches to have strong water resistance. However I find the RM030 to be uncomfortable for me much due to the height. One thing I can’t understand is why RM don’t increase the WR of their watches? It is very obvious RM can easily make a higher water resistance watch without having a thick profile. RM030 I measured is almost 14mm only has 50m water resistance while the RM005 is 22% thinner yet it has double the WR. 

 2 to 3 mm doesn’t sounds like much but when it is on my wrist it is a huge differences because of my smaller wrist. I used to own RM010 but I sold it after I found a perfect RM005.

The smaller case single digit RMs are such classic nowadays.. I got so much compliments from both WIS and nonWIS .. it looks exquisitely luxurious and fun without going over the top. 

Thank you for hearing my ranting haha 😅

🥂 
Jen


More posts: RM002RM003RM005RM010RM016RM030RM033RM055

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Randomly..

 
 By: Fjan : October 20th, 2020-10:50
Old school.. and proud of it 😉 In the middle of the Richard Mille technological storm ever pushing for technical advancement with new material and sci-fi movements and ever striving to introduce more complex and exquisite cases and dials designs... please...  

Jen, this is an amazing looking RM and I agree with you the case shape and design are quite beautiful...a true classic

 
 By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : October 20th, 2020-11:54
I think Hublot tried to imitate this case design if I am not mistaking (the spirit of big bang?) but this RM will stand the test of time!

yes you right

 
 By: Weems@8 : October 20th, 2020-15:19
Hublot have with the spirit of big bang a RM wannabe. My complain about Hublot are the busy dials, searching hands is annoying. Look at a RM, it’s always no problem to see the time at a glance.

Follow watch news and more

 
 By: Weems@8 : October 22nd, 2020-02:39
I bow the tread to Hublot a bit. Jean Claudes intention with Hublot was and is, to position Hublot as a luxury Swatch. Looking at many Hublots, the colors, forms, it reminds a lot of Swatch. The Swatch for adults ...

Yes! I love the swatch “jelly” collection!

 
 By: Fjan : October 22nd, 2020-02:53
The only Hublot I bought resemblance of the jelly concept (transparent)

Thank you! 🥂

 
 By: Fjan : October 22nd, 2020-01:52
Yes the Spirit of Big Bang does remind me of a shadow or RM.. I however do own a Hublot 😬 ... one only 🥂 Jen

Love it! Incredible watch!

 
 By: systematic.entropy : October 20th, 2020-13:55
I have literally been having RM dreams lately. 2021 may be the time to consolidate and pull the trigger. Agree on the RM005, the water resistance is a major selling point compared to more recent offerings. However, an RM030 speaks to me from a technical l... 

Thank you 🥂 [nt]

 
 By: Fjan : October 22nd, 2020-01:28

I appreciate the new case materials, but this one is a classic for many of us.

 
 By: Jay (Eire) : October 20th, 2020-18:03
I wonder what the modern RM collector would make of this watch?

Jay thank you for chiming in ..

 
 By: Fjan : October 22nd, 2020-01:48
I own RM055, RM030, RM52-01, RM63-01, RM016, RM11 and RM33 .. in all honesty, I love the RM005 as a daily watch. I am currently seeking for a RM002 or RM003 ie similar size as the 005. I love smaller watches lately.. they are so easy to wear and no hassle... 

The size (relative thinness too) is the reason I always like the older RMs.

 
 By: Jay (Eire) : October 22nd, 2020-06:23
These days the 67-02 is appealing to be precisely for that same reason, the size. And the case material and lightness of this reference too. But your 005 is a classic, enjoy it.

Completely agree

 
 By: colton_d : October 29th, 2020-12:50
The WR on certain references doesn't make a lot of sense, you have a perfect example here of a great daily piece. I'd love to see a photo of your 052-01, I have tried to track one down for a colleague won had his eye on the reference but they are hard to ... 

.

 
 By: Fjan : March 15th, 2021-12:37
...  

Haha thank you.. I have quite an extensive sneakers collection.. more than 200 pairs so far ..

 
 By: Fjan : October 22nd, 2020-01:18
AirJordan 100+ pairs Louboutin Sneakers 50+ pairs Giuseppe Sneakers 30+ pairs The one in the photo is from Gucci 🥂

That's a small museum right there

 
 By: JTCL : October 22nd, 2020-09:21
Looking forward to your next combo buddy 🥂

Can’t beat this one

 
 By: grahamhar : October 22nd, 2020-14:28
Well I’m biased but just maybe... ...  

🙏

 
 By: grahamhar : October 23rd, 2020-14:52
I think the Velcro straps should be the standard

Totally agree!

 
 By: Fjan : March 15th, 2021-12:34
The original design is timeless. I own larger modern RMs but these early originals sizes are a class of its own. Watch collectors n non watch enthusiasts friends all complimented how good it looks. Market demands on these early RMs has shot through the ro... 

Only have 1 RM

 
 By: benzng : March 20th, 2021-02:19
And happy with it I wanted to add 67-02 but prices now are crazy. ...  

Great piece!

 
 By: Tourbeon : April 28th, 2021-02:48