Photography

A nice object, a very good camera, sadly limited to 250 pieces with a substantial price increase compared to a " normal " Q2. And not sure it is better for macro pictures than a Leica D Lux 7 or a good Leica CL. Here are the official pictures: Love the su...  

I haven't yet moved from my old LX 100 to the new version - the original still gives plenty of satisfaction, but I may upgrade soon if I see a good deal. I could never see the value proposition for the D-Lux cameras unless the red dot is important. And I ... 

Panasonic LX 100 ii & D Lux 7 are virtually the same camera, but the Panasionic version comes at a more sensible price. I mentioned having the Q only to show I am not a Leica hater There are some very capable macro shooters on the site including you. For ... 

and sophisticated design (would never expect any less from Leica), but I never personally cared for the '007' branding, to me it never alluded to anything more than a terribly archaic character founded in nationalism, misogyny and aggression.... But then,... 

I've seen that one....

By the way, I just recently discovered the French 007 parody OSS 117 with Jean Dujardin - brilliant!! Especially the first film ....

Seems good as CL as I remember no macro mode

...  

Rumoured in 2022 Indeed, not the machine that springs to mind when thinking about macros

The Q is hopeless for macro, no finder, and no tilt screen. Only the red dot! The Sony RX 1 II is the camera that I used most of the time for watch-photography, because it is full-frame, has a great finder and, a tilts-screen. The camera costs the same as...