WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

unfortunately

 

that's not true.   I've purchased watches from ADs, gray market dealers, and individuals from around the world.  With the exception of those purchased from ADs, i've almost never known the original owner and often don't have any paperwork.  This is particularly true with vintage watches which were owned and worn by people who didn't care about keeping boxes or papers.

As far as I know, every single one of these was a legitimate purchase.  Nevertheless, if someone told me that 40 years ago my watch was reported stolen, i'd be pretty upset and want to see some serious proof especially after having spent tens of thousands of dollars on my purchase.  Do you really think Patek wants to get involved in a mess like this by accusing a loyal owner of buying a watch that might have been stolen but there is no absolute proof?  I just don't think they would want to get in the middle of this type of controversy.

I'm not saying it's right or wrong.  I'm just suggesting that Patek would have a lot to risk if they tried to police this type of accusation.

 

  login to reply