No worries ๐Ÿ˜‰ I should have read it

May 12, 2022,16:11 PM
 

more carefully ๐Ÿ˜…

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Ref. 3448J for Alan Banbery

 
 By: lavrentivs : May 10th, 2022-18:24
Alan Banbery was appointed the Director of Sales for the English-speaking Territories in 1965 where he did much to develop Patek Philippeโ€™s position in the market. In addition to this, he also did much to guide Patek Philippeโ€™s commitment to the preservat...  

What a treat

 
 By: keks : May 10th, 2022-18:28
Just a spectacular piece for so many reasons you generously detail above! Thanks for sharing!

You are lucky to have seen it in person...

 
 By: mdg : May 10th, 2022-18:38
...let alone try it on. It appears that the leap year has not been set properly?

A very special piece. I think of the 3448 an one of my grailsโ€ฆ

 
 By: ChristianDK : May 10th, 2022-20:01
So for me, this piece is extremely interesting and desirable. I have seen pictures before and knew the story but itโ€™s the kind of special thing that is so. Ice to be reminded of. Thank you for a great post.

Amazing story and watch!

 
 By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : May 10th, 2022-21:58

โœ…โœ…

 
 By: Michael Reilly : May 10th, 2022-22:55
Crazy great story.

A 3448 with a seconds hand! The perfect watch!

 
 By: mkvc : May 10th, 2022-23:38
I did not know such a thing existed.

Sorry to burst your bubble but I stated a "second hand" not a "seconds hand".

 
 By: lavrentivs : May 11th, 2022-18:52
In hindsight I should have stated "another hand" instead. Do pardon the confusion.

Thank you so much

 
 By: baufoam : May 11th, 2022-00:03
For posting this! I have never seen such a clear picture of Alanโ€™s watch. What a beauty!

The hand is not in the correct position.

 
 By: lavrentivs : May 11th, 2022-18:59
The hand is suppose to move 1/12 of 90 degrees over a year.

Thanks for the interesting background story !

 
 By: GLau : May 11th, 2022-12:54
This piece is very lovely and so unique ! For the seconds hand, is it hidden under the date hand in the photo ?

I stated that it is a "second hand" as in 2nd, not "seconds".

 
 By: lavrentivs : May 11th, 2022-18:55
Do pardon the confusion.

No worries ๐Ÿ˜‰ I should have read it

 
 By: GLau : May 12th, 2022-16:11
more carefully ๐Ÿ˜…

Thank you very much for this scholarly and thought provoking post. Of the Senza Lunas I have seen in person or in photographs,

 
 By: patekova : May 11th, 2022-19:47
the Banberry is for me by far the most complicated and compelling. The others simply have a blank where the moon would be and accordingly no leap year cycle indicated and no 2d hand. And thanks for pointing out the functionality of that 2d hand the functi...