aaronm
2923
Close
Assuming it is about 35mm in diameter, it has the same case and NEARLY the same dial as a 1590 that I've seen. The difference is that one had only arabic numbers at 12, and dots/sticks the rest of the way but my experience with vintages says that's probably not enough difference for Patek to have given a different ref number. For date, mid-50s
A
HELP PATEK PHILIPPE
Hello I try to find information on this model years and model, if you can help me , thanks best regards This message has been edited by aventes on 2011-12-15 15:54:55 This message has been edited by aventes on 2011-12-15 15:56:07 This message has been edi...
Close
Assuming it is about 35mm in diameter, it has the same case and NEARLY the same dial as a 1590 that I've seen. The difference is that one had only arabic numbers at 12, and dots/sticks the rest of the way but my experience with vintages says that's probab...
It is a 1461, very sure
The corpuscular 6 under the small second was used in the ref. 1461. The only alteration of the 1461 from my archive and yours is the scaling of the small second, the rest is identical. Regards Moritz
The size is wrong...
All of the 1461's I've seen, and the ones google turned up in a quick search were in the 32mm range for diameter A
I found the EXACT watch
Yes, you are right: 32mm seems to be thw size for a 1461. My favorite archive is saying 35 mm though. However, if you search at google.com under: patek 1461 10-200 you will be directed to an auctionhouse where you can find exactly the depicted watch. ...
Read my message to aaronm, please
I found the excat watch reference, that mostlikely is yours. I reckon the size issue is due to excluding or including the crown. Regards Moritz
YOU ARE THE BEST
yes it's a 1461 model, but i don't find exactly this model do you know why. Sorry for my bad english...
It is always helpful...
to enter as much infos as you have in your search: like the caliber. Tell me what caliber it is saying on the movement, and I will tell you exactly the year! Regards Moritz
Thank you very much for your time
On the mouvement 951485. Thank you sir for all your information. The best
Production years
I actually met the movement reference, the caliber. So, if it is the caliber 10-105 it was built 1940-1946, if 10-110 it was from 1940-1950 and if it has got the caliber 10-200 it was built from 1946 - 1953, which is also the final year of this series. So...
Soory where must i look?
Sorry for my ignorance and my poor english i only see 951485 where must i look? Best regards
It is the 10-200, hence 1946-1953. Dje is also confirming: clearly identified!
I just compared the movements that I could find with the picture that you have posted. This watch is clearly identified ! Regards Moritz
