The beauty of PuristS is that it is a place where we don't judge each other. If someone wants to share their joy in owning a watch, they are received with welcoming arms and interest from the fellow enthusiasts. The forum is here so people with wonderful watches can share them....that is what the owners of the modern watches do, so why not the owners of the vintage....unless you are saying that there is a difference between vintage and modern collectors? There should be no difference, and I feel very strongly that it would be wonderful to see more vintage Patek featuring here and also celebrating the past of this stunning manufacturer. Look at Maxbliss....a poster on vintage Rolex for years....and now he has posted his stunning collection of vintage Patek...Bravo Max.
On the issue of price...I don't agree. I do not agree that vintage Patek has priced itself out of the market. Rolex Daytona Paul Newman....yes, that I agree. For many Patek vintage.....no. And that is partly why I raise the issue in this way as I think it is an avenue of joy that so many could venture...
One cannot argue on the one hand that its fine for owners of modern Pateks to be free to share their watches yet for owners of vintage there is a tendency to be more discrete. It doesn't make sense to me.......
My collection is split between mainly Rolex, JLC and Patek. Within Rolex, 90% of my watches are vintage. Within JLC, 90% are modern. Within Patek, its now about 40% modern and 60% vintage. Up until this year, it was 100% modern. This year, I have seen the...
Rolex... There were so many complicated watches which Rolex didn't have! Hence the interest of your question...Both Rolex and Patek should have a ot of fans of their vintage watches, and it seems that Rolex has more vintage aficionados than Patek. It is c...
.....you hit on my central point. I think vintage Patek has an extremely interesting history, and in terms of horological interest, perhaps the richest of any manufacturer....yet, as you say, it is vintage Rolex collectors who seem more passionate. And ag...
Make no mistake, the appreciation for vintage Patek Philippes is there and abundant, even among users on our site. But it's a much more expensive piece and thus less people in the game. Also, the people in that space are sometimes more quiet about their a...
......and i agree on many points. Yes, you are probably correct that the Rolex forum is somewhat the vintage outlier, though I would also say that Blancpain has become quite similar and one or two other forums seem to develop in a similar way. However, I ...
and the answer to it is with the people/PuristS we have here - members and moderators. The biggest and very serious collectors I know/met (most of them PuristS) are kind of discreet when it comes to show what they really have - at least when we talk about...
......this is a forum where people share their watches and discuss them. This is THE place to talk about our watches. Sure, there are more DRSD....way more....but why does that mean that the rare treasures from Patek are not discussed more?
The beauty of PuristS is that it is a place where we don't judge each other. If someone wants to share their joy in owning a watch, they are received with welcoming arms and interest from the fellow enthusiasts. The forum is here so people with wonderful ...
I am not going to debate which company PP or Rolex has the best history . Both are old established companies run as a private company for many year now with single families dominating ( or owning the company as in PP case) As to which company tends to loo...
.....beautiful watches.....absolutely classic and pure. But again, I am picking up a similar theme.....collectors of modern Patek seem to post on the forum quite happily but the issue of discretion crops up when it comes to vintage Patek.....again raising...
very little other vintage Rolex is shown Why is this ? does it relate to size and wearability Does it relate to functionality - ie water proof andd tough Does it relate to value and the fact that the majority of vintage Rolex vintage that has appreacited ...
1. Quantity in existence. Many more vintage Rolex than Patek. 2. Wearability. - Size. Most vintage Pateks are too small in today's taste thus less wearable for most modern collectors. Popular vintage Rolex are mostly sporties which are significant bigger ...
......but my response would be..... 1) Quantity..... there are undoubtedly fewer vintage Patek, but there are a huge number of Patek collectors.....that suggests that the demand/supply issue should only intensify the focus. OK, I think for some Patek the ...
Pateks are not cheap. A modern Patek costs as much as a Vintage Rolex. Often much much more. I have several Patek's. All modern. Post 1990. I consider myself a "wearer" and not a collector. I own several modern Rolex watches. Again, I wear them. I don't c...
......not sure where that places me?? I am young enough to run a mile in under 6 minutes but old enough to have a son at university....i collect watches but do so with a 100% correlation to wearing them. I never started with modern Rolex ....i started wit...
Patek's have become extremely expensive and thus access to,collecting is very limited where one can pick up,a great vintage a Rolex for a fraction of either a modern or vintage Patek. There is something else though that I think is even more important. Con...
Firstly, Joe you bring up, once again a very interesting topic. I think the many answers given on this Forum have mostly answered your question or at least made some very valid points and given us food for thought. However I think Daytonaman really hit th...