5110 - Easy Choice πŸ‘Œ [nt]

Aug 11, 2019,10:22 AM

No message body

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread


Patek Travel Watches: 5110 World Time or 5134 Travel Time?

 By: amanico : August 11th, 2019-09:58
The 5110 made its appearance in 2000 and was replaced in 2006. The Travel Time 5134 arrived in 2001 and discontinued in 2008. The 5110 is a world time, which means that it gives the time of 24 cities in the world, while the 5134 is a Travel Time, giving a...  

5110 - Easy Choice πŸ‘Œ [nt]

 By: Cpt Scarlet : August 11th, 2019-10:22

I have a lot of experience on both

 By: dr.kol : August 11th, 2019-10:56
but can't make up my mind. Naturally, the Worldtime is "cooler" while the Travel Time is more readable. One vote both. Best, Kari

6-1. Thanks, Kari. [nt]

 By: amanico : August 11th, 2019-11:00
No message body

Same here. 5110, especially in Pt.

 By: mrds : August 11th, 2019-11:10
Still, there is no WT for me as long as We still have Daylight Savings Time in Europe. I just can’t stand to use a complication that shows the wrong time.

This definitely troubled me.

 By: blau : August 11th, 2019-11:34
When I owned a 5110, I used to show it off to friends, explaining that it shows the correct time all around the world, except not during most of the year.

;) [nt]

 By: amanico : August 11th, 2019-11:37

I can only agree. [nt]

 By: amanico : August 12th, 2019-07:03

5110, no contest!

 By: blau : August 11th, 2019-11:35
I owned a 5110G and have been sorely regretting giving it up.

You are correct. [nt]

 By: blau : August 11th, 2019-11:39

5110 for me. [nt]

 By: BMR : August 11th, 2019-11:54

5110 all the way. [nt]

 By: Tifosi99 : August 11th, 2019-11:58

5110P every time [nt]

 By: agyzace : August 11th, 2019-12:04

5110 πŸ€— But...

 By: 1WatchMan : August 11th, 2019-12:56
The 5134 is still an excellent reference, extremely underrated. I've been considering it a few times in the past, but currently there's no room for it in my small collection.

Yes, you're right, but still quite unbalanced

 By: 1WatchMan : August 12th, 2019-22:48
I believe could be more popular with an updated dial, I see a lot of potential πŸ€”

I guess I’m in the rare camp of 5134!

 By: fuigo : August 11th, 2019-17:05
I feel like it’s more legible and useful for my travel needs.


 By: jim vancouver : August 11th, 2019-20:58
The world timer is too busy with the blue pattern dial. The 5134 is more eligible with better proportion.

This is a dilemma I was facing a while back , the WT more elaborate, the TT easy on the eye and more practice...

 By: ZSHSZ : August 11th, 2019-22:33
5110 for me , but probably the G . Thank you my friend for bringing up this comparison.

reflecting on the picture of the 5110 above...

 By: dms : August 12th, 2019-02:20
Is that a limited edition? It has Jerusalem instead of Cairo on mine, and a different spelling for Dacca. Also, the end of the strap is "curved" between the lugs to follow the shape of the case: a small difference but a nice one.

Yes, it is. Good eye! [nt]

 By: amanico : August 12th, 2019-02:27

I’ve owned both

 By: descartes1 : August 12th, 2019-04:13
In fact traded the 5134 for the 5110 so you know where I stand


 By: Watcholic_id : August 12th, 2019-07:16
anytime anyday

5110----NO CONTEST [nt]

 By: vicunaman1 : August 12th, 2019-08:22

5110P for me...

 By: keks : August 12th, 2019-08:24
But find the 5134P very intriguing... just not same caliber piece....


 By: keks : August 13th, 2019-03:56
the 5134P housed a 240 base caliber instead I would have voted 5134... automatic make more sense to me on a travel time piece...

5110! Best ,H [nt]

 By: @WatchesandWristshots : August 12th, 2019-18:30

21-4 for 5110 [nt]

 By: Quan : August 12th, 2019-23:13

Ok, I'll play...

 By: watchme : August 13th, 2019-07:10
The 5110, due to the lineage of the PP world times, easily wins for bragging rights of a complication, however, for practical purposes, I prefer the 5134 for these reasons: (1) the cleanliness of the dial makes it easier to see and read, especially for mo... 

The world time watches of Patek are iconic and functional in today's world. My opinion. πŸ‘

 By: geross : October 19th, 2019-14:58
Beautifully done. Here are it's ancestor on display in Singapore. Thanks for sharing Nico. Cheers 🍻, friends. Geross ...  

BOTH ARE BEAUTIFUL!!! I want both in my collection.....

 By: Patek_3944 : October 22nd, 2019-14:08
The famous Patek historian (Nicholas Faulkes) wrote an article on the fabulous 5107 where he said a perfect collection could be - 5107, 5035, 5110 and 5134. I have been following this guy's words with the additional of his recommendations. The 5134 is a w...  


 By: time4fun : October 22nd, 2019-16:24
No message body

5110 is certainly sexier.

 By: Jke67245 : October 22nd, 2019-18:25
But the 5134 complication is more practical in a watch you really travel with. Another good example with this complication is the 5164, a great travel watch.

The 5110 is romantic.

 By: roger.goodgion : October 22nd, 2019-18:46
But as someone who uses a Reverso GMT when I travel, the 5134 gets my vote as a more functional watch. If it was 5110 vs 5164 what would people vote. A PP travel time that I can jump in the pool. The 5164 has your contemporary look too.

In the confusing world of DSTs and BSTs and what not, I never got the hang of using a world timer properly so......

 By: centurionone : October 22nd, 2019-23:26
Purely for functionality I would choose 5134..... no doubt that 5110 is a beauty and iconic watch but for me has no function

for me easy: 5110P [nt]

 By: Grisar : October 23rd, 2019-01:44