re-done?
This 96A is my proud gem. A is rare and I was satisfied with it , forI thought that the dial condition is good. But an expert of vintage watchs told me that this dial might be repaired. So I enlarged it and examined. Certainly there is doubt about inscrep...
Remember this watch was made in the 1940’s The condition of the dial should
Match the age Enamel looks lovely and clean I would not be surprised if the initial laquer layer has been stripped back But I am always wary to give a definitive opinion without seeing the watch in real life It is almost impossible to tell from pics Howev...
Just to add one thing The accent above Geneve
Is often a good indication as to the originality of the dial
Beautiful watch!
I do believe that it may have had some work done. The #7 marker overlaps the sub seconds dial. This is kind of a tell tale that dial work was done by somone other than Patek. Enjoy wearing this in good health!
beautiful watch either way
I also hesitate to make an evaluation without seeing the piece in person. Are the concentric circles in the sub seconds sharp? Often when refinished they are there but flattened a bit. Also are there any marks on the numerals which indicate they were remo...
thank you friends for your advice and opinion.
I am curious about the gap of minuts` dot and hole But I will enjoy this gem regardless re -done or not.
The lack of 'comma' after PATEK for old logo and...
the lack of accent above GENEVE mean that the dial has definitely being refinished. These two details are easily removed when the lacquer was removed. You can also check the side of the applied numerals for hint. Note that the placement of the 'comma' is ...
