vitalsigns
6090
I like the 5140 in this comparison.
Jan 23, 2020,19:57 PM
I thought I'd prefer the 5327, but the 5140 looks more classic and timeless.
Maybe it's the LED (?) lighting, but the 5327 looks washed out and a bit plain.
Comments:
view entire thread
Perpetual Calendar Shootout! 5140 vs 5327
By: @Patek_Ambassador : January 23rd, 2020-18:20
Just tried these both on and can’t decide! Which one do you prefer and which one do you prefer on ME relative to the photos? ...
5327
By: blau : January 23rd, 2020-18:45
When I look at a 5140, lovely as it is, all I can think is that it's a slightly larger and less perfect version of the 3940. The 5327 does its own thing, and it's a good thing. Love those numerals and the swoopy scalloped case.
I am having the same exact debate.
By: Costa (aka Connie) : January 23rd, 2020-19:54
I keep going back-and-forth between 5140 and5327. I really like the slightly larger size of the latter and the slightly more modern look. So I think 5327 is it. The cream colored dial with the rose gold is beautiful too.
I like the 5140 in this comparison.
By: vitalsigns : January 23rd, 2020-19:57
I thought I'd prefer the 5327, but the 5140 looks more classic and timeless. Maybe it's the LED (?) lighting, but the 5327 looks washed out and a bit plain.
I have seen some versions...
By: mdg : January 23rd, 2020-22:32
...where this is pronounced. And other versions where I don’t see it at all. I am sure that there are experts on this forum that have more knowledge in this area. If the 3940 is a non-starter, then I would go with the 5140, ‘squished’ numerals and all... ...
Tempted to say 5327....
By: Mr.Gatsby : January 24th, 2020-01:18
But I think it’s the 5140 for me. I find that the baton markers help to draw my attention towards the dial, and on the whole keeps a busy looking dial less busy if you know what I mean. The Roman numerals on the 5327 makes the watch look a bit too ‘rich’,...
This!
By: Thomahof : January 25th, 2020-09:50
...