during my many years of involvment with Panerai, that there are the glamour models (127, 232, 249 and so many others) and the quiet achievers. I would itemmize both the 587 and 673, in the latter category. One thing I am absolutely certain of though: when
appeared on a 6152/1 case which....for the non initiated, is known as the 1940 one. So technically, your 587 is more "authentic" than the 673 and the 1950 cases in general Picture obtained on Internet. Copyrights reserved for the rightful owner.
since they are MM models and are in a category of their own (in my book). IMO the difference between 673 and 372 is like First class vs Economy (on carriers like Singapore Airlines, not domestic US carriers lollll). The case is different and better, the h
I have another strap on order, as select members suggested, as part of my effort to better connect with my 587. But I wore it briefly today to gauge my feelings after a period of time away from it. For full disclosure, I was also recently came close to al
Jocke.. you know what.. 372 is one of the watch I just somehow have a personal bonding with. I don’t know why.. I own the watch for the pass decade and till this day whenever I put it on my wrist, it just feels so right. I can wear it for months.. I love
I first must confess that the new Marina Militare Submersible are not my taste at all. For me a Panerai Marina Militare is a Radiomir or a Luminor ( case ), but that is the old Panerai guy in me who is speaking. So, here are some " dream stuff ". 6152: My
1/ Yes, I see myself like a Paneristi. 2/ Luminor, Radiomir and Mare Nostrum are the historical lines. Submersible came after, as a reminiscence of the GPF 2/56. 3/ No, by far. There are way too many references. I only keep in mind the historical ones. 4/