Omega

. . . there's no bigger fan of the Rail . . . . . . than yours truly. And I'm relieved to have latched onto the 60th, even though I'd prefer a 2914 or 135.004. But if push came to shove, and I had to choose which would stay and which would go . . . it's t

Especially the 2846 ! Here are a couple of SM I like .. SM 300 60th anniversary and SM No time to die. Great thread, Art!

Dear Scholars Got a 1967 Seamaster 300 from 1967, which was my first diver ever, and is much loved. You might think it's a beater by the look of the bezel, but my beater (one of them) and high risk travel watch is the 1960 CK14390. I bought it with that s

Ck2914 checking in Best regards

Thank you for sharing what the AD told you. 3 nttd seamasters for your AD, vips only. Ok. Here in EU there are enough available. Some traders have not in stock, but it is possible for asking when the delivery wil continue. I do not want pay 10k on a seama

Ok, getting both is the way to go, here, as they are very different ( case, dial, hands, bezel, crown, lugs ). Bu if you had to choose only one, which one would be your favorite? I would go for the straight lugs, so for the CK 2913. You? Best, Nicolas

A quite alluring duo of Pakistani Army watches, don't you think? Sometimes, coincidences in collecting watches can lead you to luck. Here, I would say that Luck spoiled me a lot. In three years, I could find these 2 beauties. Best, Nicolas

Funny how a detail can change a watch. Even if I have a very nice one CK 2913 / 3, the lollipop second hand is the kind of feature which makes me dream of getting one, too. This one belongs to a good friend of mine. Best, Nicolas

... really undeserved I feel. It has a beautiful dial, a nice case and movement, and was one of the few watches specially designed to resist high intensity magnetic fields in those days of the 1950´s/60´s (Milgauss, IWC Ingenieur, Patek Amagnetic) which m