Comments:

This Panerai PAM 587... An obsession.

 
 By: amanico : January 8th, 2020-14:04
Just one picture taken almost one year ago...



Not a revelation, but a confirmation. A top modern Panerai. 

One of the best, in my book. 

Nicolas

It is a real deal Panerai.

 
 By: MichaelC : January 8th, 2020-16:37
I also fancy this model, love the case, crown, and pointy hands.  Good photo!

Yes, clearly one of my favorite as well. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 8th, 2020-22:15
No message body

For sure it it 👍🏼 [nt]

 
 By: Ahoi : January 8th, 2020-16:58
No message body

;) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 8th, 2020-22:15
No message body

Something special about this case without the crown guard

 
 By: JohnFM : January 8th, 2020-17:42
While I appreciate a crown guard on many PAMs, the symmetry without it really works on this watch, as well as on Ahoi's 662 ;-)

Nico, 2020 is your year for one of these classic Panerais, right?  Right!! ;-)

I think you are right. At least one, that would be great. 372 or 587... [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 8th, 2020-22:16
No message body

What do you see as the pros and cons of each?

 
 By: JohnFM : January 8th, 2020-22:28
I realize this is a very personal question ;-)

Honestly, the 587 is perfect for me. The 372, I would have maybe changed the hands. And I say maybe, because I am not really sure. No, these two are must have for me. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 8th, 2020-22:36
No message body

I agree Nicolas that the 587 is perfect -- it is my favorite modern PAM

 
 By: JohnFM : January 8th, 2020-22:55
It's a beautiful, elegant Panerai with its simple MM dial and gold, pointy hands. It seems more special to me than the 372 but I do feel that the 372's thicker hands are perfect for its case with crown guard -- rugged. Do you prefer the acrylic crystal to sapphire?

I always prefer plexy to sapphire. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 8th, 2020-23:57
No message body

No doubt. My pick for the best rad 1940 case. (Nt)

 
 By: Echi : January 8th, 2020-18:55
..

Along with this damn 662. But I would rate the 587 slightly above the 662. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 8th, 2020-22:16
No message body

Whaaaatttt... i wouldn’t say so.

 
 By: Ahoi : January 9th, 2020-07:08
It depends for me as well what you have already.

Well, if you already have the 587, then the 662 is the way to go! ;) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-07:09
No message body

LOL... if you have Luminor with a black dial, the 662 is the Radiomir to choose IMO... [nt]

 
 By: Ahoi : January 9th, 2020-07:39
No message body

I see it in third position, personally. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-07:53
No message body

372, 587, 662? [nt]

 
 By: Ahoi : January 9th, 2020-08:28
No message body

Yep! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-08:54
No message body

I would Rather: 673,662, [nt]

 
 By: Ahoi : January 9th, 2020-14:15
No message body

Why not. I still have a big love for the 372. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-15:40
No message body

Yes, I know . [nt]

 
 By: Ahoi : January 10th, 2020-12:10
No message body

Great modern Panerai ...

 
 By: Cpt Scarlet : January 9th, 2020-02:30
I think I need this one in my life 🦇

Yep. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-02:30
No message body

Amongst many others ;-))))))) [nt]

 
 By: Cpt Scarlet : January 9th, 2020-02:36
No message body

Not necessarily. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-02:38
No message body

Probably right as I am happy with my Panerai collection [nt]

 
 By: Cpt Scarlet : January 9th, 2020-02:49
No message body

+1. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-02:54
No message body

Very nice, lots of charm and the soul of vintage Panerais. [nt]

 
 By: VMM : January 9th, 2020-03:05
No message body

That's it. Gracias, Vicente. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-03:12
No message body
Load More Comments >>