Throughout some changes in my situation, a world timer watch is more closer than i thought. The Aqua Terra wt, or the Montblanc wt, one of these could become my first watch for this year.
Other watches, an oscillator and today maybe the decision can fall, the auction is almost done. My first used watch. The vintage universe.
diving or swimming. When the WR is higher, the protection against dust, mud, heavy rain, high humidity, high temperature differences is also better. It simply makes me feel more comfortable knowing my travel watch might take a beating too.
I always wonder why in general it isn’t possible to have a WR of 10 (or - that's okay with me too - at least 6) bar as a minimum standard for all modern watches. Is this really so difficult to produce?
Other world timers are desk watches. Better said, it are business trip watches. Maybe sauna stream must be overwon. An other point why brands use a poor WR rate for world timers are the difficulties that come with sapphire case backs. See the IWC Aquatimer comes with a solid case back to get a better WR. Patrick Y ask IWC if IWC wil bring a Aquatimer with a sapphire case back. Bad for me, IWC don’t.
While i go on inspecting world timers from many brands, i wil check WR for you.
it's just a matter of convenience or a cost-saving measure. Or the manufacturers have the impression that the customers don't reflect on this feature and therefore save themselves the effort.
I look at pictures, ch24. Maybe i must see the JLC’s geophysics in the flesh to get a better opinion.
It’s a kind of style that must be burned in me. My experience with watches are when i see pictures and after some time i am in a store, that i fell for the watch and make the sales people happy with a purchase. The opposite is possible either, like Rolex on pictures are for me a no go, and spotting Rolex in a window display and in the shop rack, it is clear it are my kind of watches. These are so nice in real, the YM in white gold and the bleu Milgauss GV.