Comments:
Quantieme Perpetuel or not?
Which decision should i take? ..my decision well depend on your comments my friend,is this a good choice based on the watches complications? can someone explain what first,secon,third,and forth year is? ,,,,,,,cheers !.,,.,.,.,.,.DonD
Hmmm
I own the steel/platinum version and I love it. So Im partial to saying yes go for it but its a substantial purchase. So I say yes!
OpC
It's just so mint
I really love that it is so thin and the 2121 based movement is sublime. Frankly, I also love the 39mm size. Good luck with your decision.
OpC
I bought this last year
and I must say AP RO is not the most readable perpetual. Nice watch anyhow but with the same money I can find nicer.
You asked about 1,2,3 and 4. Number 4 represents leap year and i.e. # 2 is the second year after leap year. Nice complication but not the most useful one.
Best, Kari
Hi Don
I recently tried on the rose gold equation of time and it is also a stunning watch, I'd recommend this to look at also before you part with some hard earned cash.
I do like the RO perpetual....
But like others have said have a look at the RO EOT, maybe set to Canada MTL for you, that would be fantastic!
A real looker Don.
I adore the dial on this one with the RG case. If it is a good fit with your others I say go for it!
Solving an equation can be fun
In more or less the same price range, I would also pick the Equation of Time, set to your favourite city.
In any case, you're a lucky man 
Best,
Nicolas
It's a great watch
I traded a PP 5980 for it earlier this year in steel and have never looked back. In fact I'm wearing it as I type it. It's an amazing complicated daily wearer. I say go for it.
One of my favorites.
I wear the same RG RO QP almost every day. I really like that it is a casual special piece. I find my JA WG Equation of TIme more formal, so it sees less wrist time. Both are amazing AP's and fun to wear.
Let s know your choice, all are great.
JerryW