Comments:
Perhaps
MTC:
Similarities: precious metal, complications, dial collarDissimilarities: design, recognition, popularity, bracelet/strap
I would think there would be room in a collection for both but if you insist on a four watch collection, one may have to go.
Getting rid of the ROC and replacing it with an Offshore makes good sense.
I like the PF more than the ROC, without question. Now if it were the current 41mm ROC with new movement and proper date location, I would keep the AP.
Looking at the 4 watch collection...
...not crazy about the pushers on the AP but I prefer the contrasting sub-dials on the AP vs PF.
But if you get the ss Off Shore you'll be heavy on AP...arguably not the worst scenario one could find one's self in but still if variety's a consideration...
Wearing th parm now
And wondering if i sho
uld just stand pat. Ap is thinner. Parm has higher wr
uld just stand pat. Ap is thinner. Parm has higher wr
4 watches is not enough space for two chronographs
Let alone two solid gold, blue faced chronographs.
The PF is more low key, and to my eye, slightly prettier.
Choice between the two might depend on the other three watches you keep.
But you're brave trying to cut down to 4.
I would keep the AP.
You had a couple before and it seems that you returned so that should mean something…
Put them both up for sale
and keep the one that gets the most inquires and sell the other