is atypical for a swiss maker- that's an English style lever arrangement, using swiss lever escape wheel geometry.
An interesting touch, no doubt, to save space inside the tourbillon.
The pallet stone spec sheet confuses me. I understand the purpose of the dimple-like spring, but why use it? Surely
for someone skilled as Laurent grinding a pallet stone to correct width of even thousandths of a millimeter is not
terribly difficult. Plenty of people have hand made escapements with normal simple slots for impulse stones without
this added complexity of the dimple spring. Why? I can see an advantage in leaving more room for shellac to wick
into the stone to pallet setting, but I don't understand why this design feature is needed. Can you educate me Don?
Surely I'm missing something.
The same for the double hack spring. Why engage both the balance and seconds wheel? Why not one or the other?
Hack mechanisms, while nice, inherently do interrupt the isochronism of the oscillator for a time, I have heard as much
as an hour for the balance to fully restore normality to the amplitude. Is there some advantage to a double hack? Or is
it just for show?
I assume that one of the hairspring studs or both are adjustable to set the centering of their breathing exactly 180 degrees
apart somehow, the purpose of the Straussman setup, but it is not clear to me in their design how they adjust this.
If there is no way to do so, it would have to be perfectly machined, and this is doubtful. Without a way to center both springs
180 from each other, and over the dead point of the escapement, it would only create more errors in timing due to unbalanced
hairspring poise error, especially considering they are not concentrically breathing overcoil hairsprings.
Sorry to ask so many questions. I absolutely love Mr. Ferrier's work, I just don't understand it well enough

The technical drawings are wonderful.
-O