...that was most eagerly anticipated from a personal perspective. Heck, you owe it to us to dissect the philosophical underpinnings of this piece! Let's face it; who is better placed to tell us whether Hegel would have thought the aesthetics ideal, or whether Habermas would 'swallow' it?
Would Kant have described the watch as phenomenon or noumena? Is there an ontological rationale for the existence of the watch - Beat can conceive of it, so it must exist??? Would it have stumped Stumpf? C'mon, chum, let rip!
Cheers,
pplater.
Thanks Steve, this was my thought too. I wouldn't own the H9 in isolation, but as part of a series of Haldimann pieces - H1, H8, H9 - it is a very powerful statement.
And I am still thinking about it hours later, so it has obviously done its job!
Andrew


Is the black surface reflective, Valentin, as it seems to be in your wristshot? If so, it got me thinking about the mirror paintings of Michelangelo Pistoletto that reflect life back at you. Pistoletto also emphasised art in everyday life as the H9 does.
I like the idea of the H9 reflecting time back at you, with the beating heart inside. As I enjoy wearing two watches, and often turn the Reverso to the non-time-telling side when I don’t want to be reminded of the details of time passing, I could easily wear the H9 on one wrist and a more typical time-telling watch on the other.
But as I said in response to Steve, the H9 only ultimately works for me in the context of the H1 – H8 – H9 sequence. If I could only own one, I wouldn’t start with the H9.
I do appreciate your thoughts on the watch very much and I can’t wait for the comments/fireworks at Basel!
Andrew
A very unique concept that is unique to Herr Haldimann.
Be waiting to see it!
Stephen
more surprising coming from someone as talented as Haldiman.
Thank you for your write up Valentin but I can't understand the philosophy behind this piece. Does it at least have hands?